Dez 06

Space Topolocical Insulators for an adiabatic energy vector to the Crystalline Phase

We enable “warp drive” for a reinterpretation of transport within space by addressing adiabatic – notion of preexistent states, unobservable universe, Notes about Black Hole Cavity States – On the Trail of Magnetic Monopoles, quantum space states for the Inner Infinity Notion of existence in n-fractal dimensional transitions at horizons mediators (Zero Kelvin quantum vacuum notion), such as DMF field virtuals (Dark Matter Field), global insulators via the Higgs Field, quantum particles, Dirac String neutralinos and quantum monopole preexistent states via the gluon surfaces and taping of quarks (post quantum mechanics world view for diffraction and interference).

We set a world view of no outer transport (inertial vs. global (free falling frame) through “space” but inner (non-locality) transport by photonic mediation and (in principle) a diphotonic basic quantum vacuum enabling mediators that are addressing adiabatic quantum states and quantum foam (Dirac Foam, Crystalline Phase) in order to stretch out a virtual space and space states (for the real and quantum world regime via the ( outer) nuclear shell model by Maria Goeppert Mayer and Jenssen (Note about imaginary negative mass in a beyond Dirac world view for higgs string vacua foldings – BH states – BH identity- and electron nuclear shell model http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/66316/note-about-imaginary-negative-mass-in-a-beyond-dirac-world-view-%E2%80%93-seen-from-higgs-string-vacua-foldings-bh-states-bh-identity-and-electron-nuclear-shell-model, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/note-imaginary-negative-mass-beyond-dirac-world-view-seen-thewalt ) and knot theory, Borromean Rings, Thermodynamics beyond the Newtonian and Boltzmann world view extended by the Higss field Theory and (anti) hydrogen model Preliminary Information about the Matter Creation Process in the Higgs-Field, A Black Hole Cavity State by the Inner Infinity Notion.

For “warp drive” that addresses matter we construct a warp spin glass medium in order to have a virtual highway by a by DMF virtuals Glider surface and navigational quantum spin state field (gliding, virtual space sailing and information navigation) in a monopole state (Dirac String Wilson Lines and Loops, Dirac String Neutralino) that will be translated (geared up and down) by a Majorana and Rydberg like Regime for the real world and Condensed Matter Physics (after the ultra cold and Zero Kelvin (Quantum Criticality) Cold (Quantum Levitation, Superconducting, BCS Cooper Pairs and Triplets, Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer ) and Dark (Higgs Field, insulator) phase.

The coupling phase will be applied in order to enable a spin glass bonding for a 0,00001 to 0,0001 to 0,9 to 0,9999 to 0,2 to 0,29 … to 3 Kelvin (inverse n-fractal gluon color coupling for surfaces and qcd colors for the Zero Kelvin Regime and Phases in an Regime for diffraction and interference by inverse Boltzmann states, for instance Mpemba Effect) phase layers in a shifting ultra cold regime (quantum criticality) in order to apply the adiabatic states of the unobservable universe.

This can be shifted in an n-dimensional phase transition (Crystalline states dissolving gravity, Tesselation, surface couplings of Black Hole to particle states at Horizons and surfaces for Efimov states like quark multi states and multi quark taping, ‘couplings’) and swirls to a quantum levitation field that encapsulates the thermodynamics. This is about the feasibility of transport for living beings and ordinary matter.

Hence, we have concerning the energy balance in the world view of an imaginary negative mass Regime in a Region of Neutrality no strong need for a an exothermic process or low negative energy Balance, as we set energy and matter by a proton folding to electron bonding and neglect the energy matter conversion.

We do not address an energy matter transformation in Einstein’s E= MC2 world view.

The principle and world view is not based on an energy matter conversion world view but on the application of a principle by a diphotonic crystalline mediation and applied diffraction and interference by a quantum monopole state for a Dirac String neutralino of a monopole state crystalline phase by an, for instance, high energy spin 2 photon (thanks Michael Balmer) as a Dirac String surface of a photon to photon Black Hole coupling that addresses a Black Hole cavity state regime (implosion point).

 

 

In this world view we set mass as a kind of quantum state by energy: mass is a unique imprint of an

energy folding (basically protons) and bonding (basically electrons) in a phase transition within space topology. (What is mass in view to energy – The Problem with the conservation of energy on an universal scale ).

Therefore we do not need to calculate the energy balance but the implosion “string” points of the cavity states regime that will be initiated as a kind of inverse hypernova in a negative proton decay process.

A Black Hole Cavity State by the Inner Infinity Notion

We do not need to apply nuclear fusion but high energy cavity states by a Black Hole to Black Hole

cavity state photonic coupling for preexistent adiabatic states without addressing the gamma ray or antimatter energy release by stripping the outer nuclear shell orbits of the electrons.

This is why we do not address the antimatter or (positive) charge identity or a gamma ray release but enable an intergalactic spin glass surface regime on a quantum electron state beam that will be transformed by infinitesimal steps and in a soliton to solenoid regime for the vibration of the Higgs String Vacua that dissolves gravity.

Gravity is not applied as such but the Mini Rindler Horizons for the surfaces to the Black Hole state (outer nuclear shell model) knot bondings and Borromean Rings that allow to describe the inverse States of interference.

The adiabatic states decouple for the moment of an energy transfer. An instantaneous ‘positive’ energy transfer or shift can result in a cooling of the overall system states.

For the technology we need a quantum computer for the prime number regime that is eliminating not preferable waves in a 2d world sheet.

For the technology we need a quantum computer for the prime number regime that is eliminating not preferable waves in a 2d world sheet, a quantum annealing distributed device for the calculation of the majorana states coupling regime (for instance, deep inelastic scattering (DIS), for the gluon color spin glass (no plasma!) and digital GPUs (Graphics Processing Unit) that apply for the wavefunction from the real world and an extended version of matter by Condensed Matter Physics and the quantum devices.

We need a prime number based quantum computer for the low Kelvin phase and a non prime Number, string vacua knots based quantum computer for the dimensional transition of the Zero Kelvin Regime for the 0 to 0,1 Kelvin inner infinity notion based virtual quantum space notion to the Crystalline and ultra cold, quantum criticality phase in order to apply the Dirac String to a Wilson Loop and dissolve the Loop to the Wilson Line for QCD.

We extend QCD by the gluon phase. We need to construct the Schwarzschild implosion points for Surfaces , bondings and cross sections, photonic surfaces and interference for the Boltzmann T state (entropy) regime and entropy phases. We will extend the Entropy formula by Boltzmann (S= K. ln W) for an inverse entropy state regime.

This gives us the opportunity to calculate Planck Phases, preexistent non Planckian phases and Neutrino oscillation for Higgs String vacua vibration.

This gives us insights for “Time Layers” (t, lower case letter) for the Fourier Transformation so that we can show the imprint of t-layers in a phase transition of the Non Zero Kelvin Regime for the entropy phases (inverse phases).

This allows quantum locking for time scales for quantum atomic ‘clocks’ as a phase and clock Generator (time phase metronome).

We will apply this framework model in order to describe the quantum coupling and spin glass Lightning regime on that a vessel can sail within space.

We construct a string sail for a preexistent, prematter swirl vessel.

The string sail works as a kind of a navigator signal. The sailing vessel is still in a virtual phase.

Transport will not be enabled by movement through space but by phasing in and out to the virtual Vessel within an preexistent Planck T to t Regime (Non-Planckian to Planckian, dissolving locality and

Applying space topology, topological phases).

This means that passengers need to be adapted to the phase transition. The T to t transport works ‘backwards’ in a virtual sense.

Passengers ‘start’ in the’destination’ point in a string vessel that is not ‘there’ at T-t (Planck to non-Planck) ‘Time’ (quantum locking phase for Planck Time in a non Newtonian Regime Thermodynamics and Entropy (phases).

The string vessel is giving navigation to the real world (transport ‘ framing’) that is in a quantum Locking phase space device, not a ‘space ship’, you may say ‘ship space’.

In order to have a kind of space ship, we arrange the quantum locking in a quantum chamber.

The quantum chamber will be sent from the real world, the departure point for passengers and ordinary matter that is set to be relocated in a vessel.

We set up an intergalactic navigation network.

Therefore we need exact measurements and calculations for feasibility studies and entry points concerning stellar objects and radiation sources or levels for navigation.

We need to calculate the phase shifting for gravity and Black Hole radiation and the ultraviolet regime.

We apply ‘space states’: ultra cold and cold, dark and a Zero Kelvin inner infinity notion Regime (ZK-Regime in a dimensional phase transition).


This Ansatz can as well be applied for a beyond silicon photonics computing device and technology, communication, navigation, mobile devices and ‘hard ware’ (photonic multi dimensional transformations, multi ‘D’ printing and production.

Boltzmann was correct at his time by describing the entropy states and distributions of quantum states for a (gas) system by the Boltzmann entropy formula (S = k. ln W).

We extend the Boltzmann (Entropy) [Phase] Regime for the inverse entropy phase and the quantum Inverse interference of the transitional states (comparable to the Mpemba effect, further example

for post Newtonian Thermodynamics: The new thermodynamics: how quantum physics is bendingthe rules, Experiments are starting to probe the limits of the classical laws of thermodynamics. http://www.nature.com/news/the-new-thermodynamics-how-quantum-physics-is-bending-the-rules-1.22937

We develop new mathematics and operators for the inverse entropy phases, the crystalline phase, the phase transitions and the Dark Matter Field.

Michael Balmer’s notes: Nuclear Configuration and the nuclear shell model

http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/37620/michael-balmers-notes-nuclear-configuration-and-the-nuclear-shell-model

New Mathematics for Dark Matter by Michael Balmer

The Boltzmann Entropy Picture

Boltzmann Regime

(S = k. ln W)
Microstates to macrostates – Molecules – outer to inner Ring

Density distribution

Boltzmann Regime

Inverse Boltzmann Phase Space, beyond inverse Boltzmann distribution

(A temperature below absolute zero http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/66686/a-temperature-below-absolute-zero)
A phase transition within a quantum non quantum threshold to the quantum vacuum inner phase space alignment (inner infinity notion).

A phase transition as such is an (inverse) quantum locking state

Inverse Boltzmann Phase Space

π/prime zero value distribution,
n-fractal

    Proposal for an experiment

(the mathematics have to be worked out for π to prime zero values (distribution), π to prime n-fractal

The phase states and quantum non-quantum world threshold in a phase transition for the inner infinity notion.

Quantum vacuum √(-1 )= 0 a phase transition at tesselation to √(0 ) = -1 in n-fractal states

Infinitesimal tangents

Infinitesimal tangents as its own parallel to the Zero Kelvin Regime

Ring Theory

Molecular entropy states via Ring Theory

The theoretical cavity implosion points are in relation to Beta Plus (proton — > neutron) and Beta Minus (neutron — > proton) Decay and the theoretical inversion of N -> Z/e.

The neutron is made of two negative Up Quarks which is 1/3 and one positive Down Quark which is 2/3. The proton is made of two up positive Up Quarks and one negative down Quark. (thanks Michael Balmer)

In the Higgs Field, fermions are unused and uncharged, they do not interact with matter or charge. What is lacking is the crystallization by the matter boson (neutrino) that is responsible for mass (M) and the information boson , the photon that is responsible for charge (E), so that we have the E/M entity of existence by the Energy –Matter word view in view to the energy translation, in Einstein’s world view by the speed of light and the Planck’s Quanta.

The anti hydrogen –H 1 has a negative proton in its nucleus. This is a neutron and the reason why the nucleus of –H1 does not annihilate. What is annihilating in Dirac’s world view are the electron (e-) and positron (e+). But in a world view of imaginary negative mass and the Dark Matter field, this is a phase transition and the charge is shielded by the Dark Matter field to the quantum vacuum (negative field of existence, shielded by the region of neutrality).


 

 

ψy=-iM (N-+) y= 0

 

y->Ve->Wf(w-+Zo)->Sf(Qrk)->N->ψ((N)->Z/e+Ve) = ************ H1

 

(thanks Michael Balmer)

 

The Formation of Elements by assigning charge (E) and Mass (M) to an unused and uncharged Neutron in the Higgs Field

The Formation of Elements by assigning charge (E) and Mass (M) to an unused and uncharged Neutron in the Higgs Field

 

We set up a Black Hole (circumference) cavity state for an inverse decay about the reversal of quarks in the phase transition from existence to non-existence for the E/M notion to existence in the Higgs field.

The tangents at the surfaces to the … Measuring up of states to the cavity points are being investigated.

N < – – Z/e

Higgs Dirac Anti Hydrogen as a string phase

H1 < – – – – – H1

Implosion on a string phase

Why do physicists say that the proton has a very long decay rate?

Neutrino induced Higgs “decay”, decay or radiation?

Binding energy? The Neutron phase transition is happening on an atomic state

Binding energy is part of the shielding in the Higgs field by neutrinos In a photonic transition.

Decay is by destabilizing the phase transition to the wave function in the entropy phases.

We set up a world view of a topological phase transition in a dimensional phase space alignment (granularity of the quantum vacuum, entanglement by non locality to inner “transport” due to space topology (energy “binding”, QCD to QED.

Quantum Space locking for an intergalactic spin glass highway – a Beyond Silicon Photonics Model for Computing


Further Reading:

The Formation of Elements by assigning charge (E) and Mass (M) to an unused and uncharged Neutron in the Higgs Field

geschrieben von Sternau \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Okt 25

weiterlesen »

geschrieben von Sternau \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sep 18

This post serves as a „proof“ because some people, like staff of the Ministry of Economics in the Saarland (Germany, Saarbrücken), not all of them, but some, pretend that my assertions in physics would not be „proven“, some are still not officially  accepted, but this is  just a matter of time, I remember most scientists I am in contact with, being aware of this, comments like „brilliant“ and some more, even „stronger“,  have been communicated on a daily basis, but especially in the western countries, there is a tendency of trying to ignore those things, in order to protect their fundings only, while trying to blend out the life and the work of their own children, pupils, students, citizens, employers or employees, pensioners or whoever, this is why I am compiling this Blog post.

The reason is not about self-praisal. In Germany, this is sill necessary in order to overcome a national silence, hidden or feigned  „amnesia“ and ignorance. We who are doing the most decisive work have deserved the respect, honor and payment for our work and  commitment, we all, in the universities, at the companies, in school, at home, in the country, outside our countries, wherever we are, with whom ever we are in contact with, doing the „right“ thing, developing awesome theories and technology, enabling other people, other students or scientists, other employees, other children or pensioners, foreign poeple who are visting our countries, refugees, or officials, police men really doing their job, politicians really doing their job, journalists and media really doing their job, teachers really doing their job, scientists really doing their job, and before all, parents really doing their „job“, loving their children and not just kissing the political party or the church or the company or whoever, whoever is really doing his/her job!




I am observing this every day, especially people from other non-western, cultures, for instance indian, brazilian or east european cultures like Poland or Russia, remember, the Polish code crackers have been the biggest help for Alan Turing’s work, not anybody else, I am talking occasionally to those wonderful polish people here in Germany and it breaks my heart how badly they are treated by  our Government, the same for young or old people from, for instance, Rumania, I can tell you stories that really have happened, and you would not believe it …..it is heart breaking, but my hands are like fettered by my own Government, how greatly they treat their children, how proud they look, and how badly Germany is treating its own children, how humiliated and agressive they look, and these are the very reasons!

BTW, you western bad science „teachers“ to hell with TYPOS, because: A Genius is not about IQ, intelligence is not about the brain, the brain is not about thinking. Read the story in german language about Évariste Galois at the end of this article, it is about the bad conditions of the education system in his life time, and this is still at the core of the western education system and there is no doubt about this, and the ignorance on a political level.

I remember Michael Balmer asking me Who I am „….Who you are“, writing things like „Brilliant“ as a Comment in in our secret group after posting my newest theory about theoretical physics, and deleting his own comment shortly afterwards. I can’t help it, this is not about the mind control by NASA/JPL and the Ivy League, no?

Preliminary Information about the Matter Creation Process in the Higgs-Field

http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/67498/preliminary-information-about-the-matter-creation-process-in-the-higgs-field

 

 

So where are the data from NASA and ESA and the correct interpretation? Who started to debunk Einstein’s myth about STR/GTR (not his photo electric effect!), Michael Balmer said it correctly, for the Dark Matter field and The verification of light not bending is Shadows and for Time until Matter,

… I am always giving people their correct credits, but why are they still refering to Einstein regarding theories about Black Holes or Nuclear Fission? Didn’t people recognize that Wheeler, Einstein, and even Stephen Hawking are hiding the correct interpretation in order to protect their energy models and control of other cultures by for instance the nuclear industry? What about micro Black Hole Cavity States and photon – photon Micro BH coupling?

May be you start here? 

Theoretical Physics for new energy – IT – Energy Cluster

Science is about understanding, not about „knowledge“, and it starts with parenting and at the Kindergarden, at school and at university and the companies, and it is related to our governments and parliaments and laws and the energy and IT  models and foreign policy, and it is about a false flag system and nothing else!

This post should demonstrate that a talent has debunked this Model about Time Crystals by some Nobel Laureates and scientists of the Ivy League, for instance MIT, Harvard or CalTech in his mind within NANOSECONDS, the real „problem“ for this mind was about putting this into an appropriate wording, so that other „scientists“ of the Ivy League are able to grasp it, for students of india and the BRICS states, this is less a „problem“, and remember, I love the Alma Mater of people, I really love CalTech and Harvard and Princeton and the Technion, the IAS and NASA and would love nothing more than to work for them and get paid by them .. recently I said in a conversation: „….and now to NASA AMES research Center, those „idiots“, this should be an honor  to you!

It is not that I do not like those people there, I was in California several times and this was always my dream, Silicon Valley and Stanford, I wanted to study computer science at Stanford and add the Natural Sciences later, being a banker was about enabling research, freeing our minds in order to enable research and technology transfer, but the core are all people, and „For all mankind“ should not be just an odd NASA slogan!

 

 

It is about what we are really doing and saying, not what we pretend to do and say and think!

We do not need our minds being controlled but being liberated, not liberated from people, children are innocent and people cannot be bad, but an artificial belief can trigger artificially made so called „bad“ people, that are  not „bad“, but the belief is insane, this is why we are ought to attack this belief, because Alan Turing was the „true“ patriot, we are the patriots, my best friend Georg Drakenberg and his family are the patriots, we all are patriots, all over the world, WE ARE MANKIND, we are KIND and HUMBLE and we do not humiliate people or our children or torture them, we do not torture animals, hunting animals and killing them fast without uneccessary pain is a natural and awesome gift, we are gifted! Breeding them in the slaughterhouse is really painful for those animals!

Our children deserve awesome parents fighting for their rights! Our students deserve awesome  teachers and Professorship fighting for their work! Our citizens deserve awesome politicians doing their jobs! Our media deserve awesome journalists doing their job and fighting for the truth! Our countries deserve awesome scientists doing their job, fighting for facts! Our environments deserve awesome researchers studying nature and fighting for us and our environments!  Our children and the next generation deserve awesome engineers fighting for the best and safest and cleanest technology! People deserve awesome researchers and employers in order to keep them healthy!

Did you know that one of the first Twitter Accounts with a high impact on global scale following me was from Israel? The Technion, the energy incubator of the Technion, the GTEP, Israel Space, the ASRI and some more Technion related accounts are still following me on Twitter (https://twitter.com/neogrid – https://twitter.com/hixgrid), Stanford Energy was just trying to catch me as follower, some do no more follow because I had to block them temporarily, like Andreas Warburton of CERN,  but the reason of my blocking was not about Andreas, it was about what my Government has done here in Germany, and my Government, my Alma Mater, the European Business School, Schloß Reicharthausen Prof Ulrich Grimm and Prof Klaus Evard, Professor Georg H. Küster and Prof Manfred Bruhn, Prof Roswita (added later on:Mayer) I do  not remember her last name right now, I am not sorry, but her lectures  have just been boring and odd, and Prof Schulte have not done their job!

This is why my parents have to blame the CDU and their Government because the educational system is fully broken and not me! They have simply not done their job and I have given sufficient explanations about the reason why! I am not willing to get tamed like John Forbes Nash, he was humiliated by this own wife!  A spouse has to do her „job“ as well! For her husband and her children! Got it, Irvana Trump? (!) 😉


Protect your own family, not against your children, your husband or spouse, or a talent and scientist and whitstleblower, but against false flag mediators, so that all those children will not suffer in Syria and become poor and homeless in your own bloody country! Isn’t this what Martin Luther-King  was saying? I have a dream? Why dreaming? Doing it! Yes, we can, and we are not doing just nothing! Doing nothing and remaining silent is even worse than doing the „false“ thing.

What we do not want are false flags, and I love people in Israel and Iran! I have many friends there! And there are more and more fans! And I love Princess Leia in Star Wars, she has sent a message via R2D2 to her true friends, fighting for the Republic, like Évariste Galois, we are the working class, we are patriots and we really love you all! Good night and good luck!

—————–

1 to 5 Nanoseconds ……:

for debunking this post about Time Crystals:

lol, this is utter nonsense, look up Noether current and Coulomb’s law, have a look at the Antimatter (tachyonic charge identity) .. there are no symmetries and asymmetries, those people need them in order to develop a technology by gauge theory, but gauge theory is flawed …
quasi FTL communication via for instance neutrinos is not about time but about preexistent states, guys!!!
http://hixgrid.de/pg/blog/read/62950/a-black-hole-state

Zero in physics

http://hixgrid.de/pg/blog/read/63603/zero-in-physics

lol, this is utter nonsense, look up Noether current and Coulomb's law, have a look at the Antimatter (tachyonic charge…

Gepostet von Oliver Thewalt am Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2016

https://www.facebook.com/Science.Network.Hixgrid/posts/1326940554039612

 

https://www.facebook.com/oliver.thewalt/posts/10155044139211473

 

Physicists Create World’s First Time Crystal

Time crystals were first predicted in 2012. Now researchers have created time crystals for the first time and say they could one day be used as quantum memories.

 

Comments:

Oliver Thewalt i will give more evidence soon!
5. Oktober 2016 um 09:53
Jonathan Vos Post
Jonathan Vos Post .
Please recall, 4 years ago, my finding a flaw in the first two „Time Crystals“ papers, having Physics Nobel Laureate Brian David Josephson agree with me, and pass my correct critique to the particle physicist who so erred in public. I detailed that on Facebook.
1 · 5. Oktober 2016 um 15:25
Oliver Thewalt
Oliver Thewalt Thanks, Jonathan, can you give me the concrete FB resource (link) for your critique?

Yes, but this has not taken into account the charge identity …… I had conversation with Prof Márcio Roberto de G Maia https://twitter.com/MarcioRdeGMaia about this. I have to edit this before I can publish it.

Pawyigh Lee Montgomery How should the current charge be identified? By spin?
6. Oktober 2016 um 06:44

Pawyigh Lee Montgomery In reply to a Physics World shared link on „Demistifying Spin 1/2“, I suggested that, while walking on the right side of a path, a half spin will put you on the left.
6. Oktober 2016 um 06:53

Pawyigh Lee Montgomery Explains in a nutshell the current political climate in the U.S. and U.K.

Jonathan Vos Post .
Brian Josephson agrees with me, about the error I found on hearing
about Wilczec’s discovery, in the New Scientist that I read at Gladston
airport, Queensland, Australia, emailed me and Jack Sarfatti and
others to say so, and elucidates why, on the errors in the 2 „Time
Crystal“ papers by his fellow Nobel Laureate Frank Wilczek.

I suggested that the protocl is for Brian to explain the corrections
to Frank Wilczek
Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 USA

=====================
Classical Time Crystals
Alfred Shapere, Frank Wilczek
(Submitted on 12 Feb 2012)

We consider the possibility that classical dynamical systems
display motion in their lowest energy state, forming a time analogue
of crystalline spatial order. Challenges facing that idea are
identified and overcome. We display arbitrary orbits of an angular
variable as lowest-energy trajectories for nonsingular Lagrangian
systems. Dynamics within orbits of broken symmetry provide a natural
arena for formation of time crystals. We exhibit models of that kind,
including a model with traveling density waves.

Comments: 5 pages, 1 figure
Subjects: Other Condensed Matter (cond-mat.other); General Relativity
and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); High Energy Physics – Theory (hep-th);
Mathematical Physics (math-ph); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1202.2537v1 [cond-mat.other]
Submission history
From: Frank Wilczek [view email]
[v1] Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:48:47 GMT (33kb,D)

=====================
Quantum Time Crystals
Frank Wilczek
(Submitted on 12 Feb 2012)

Difficulties around the idea of spontaneous breaking of time
translation symmetry in a closed quantum mechanical system are
identified, and then overcome in a simple model. The possibility of
ordering in imaginary time is also discussed.

Comments: 6 pages, no figures
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Other Condensed Matter
(cond-mat.other); Superconductivity (cond-mat.supr-con)
Cite as: arXiv:1202.2539v1 [quant-ph]
Submission history
From: Frank Wilczek [view email]
[v1] Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:57:10 GMT (21kb)
=====================
1 · 6. Oktober 2016 um 08:51

Jonathan Vos Post .
I first saw this described in a New Scientist at the news stand of Brisbane airport, Queensland, Australia.

What was wrong with the example as given in NS, claiming literally infinite lifetime for memory stored this way, was that it used loops of superconducting wire. Careful reading of the modern Mathematical Physics literature on superconductivity shows that it has finite lifetime.
1 · 6. Oktober 2016 um 08:52

———————————

———————————

Electric charge – is this what we thought?

Noether current: Noether current and Coulomb’s law, have a look at the Antimatter (#tachyonic #charge #identity) .. there are no symmetries or asymmetries as such in nature

About Noether current: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/69891/noether-current-for-a-local-gauge-transformation-for-the-klein-gordon-lagrangian

Quote: (Prof Márcio Roberto de Garcia Maia, Federal University of Southern Bahia
https://twitter.com/MarcioRdeGMaia/status/735860868957753344)

„It is not a technical (in the sense of engineering) concern, but rather the fact that it seems to me that, as it happens to mass, there is some circularity in its definition. So, when I say ‚operational point of view‘, I mean ‚ how is it supposed to be measured and what assumptions are made in such a definition/measurement. For instance, what comes first: Coulomb law or the charge definition? Or is there some circularity between these two aspects? This concern is related to some calculations I have made related to a ‚missing term‘ in Ampere-Maxwell law. The existence of this missing term is acknowledged by Hehl (Univ of Colony) and Obukhov in a series of papers (see ‚premetric electrodynamics‘). This leads to a certain ambiguity on the definition of the electromagnetic field, but they argue that one can get rid of this ambiguity performing certain experiments. And this is the point: it seems to me that the circularity ramains because the interpretation of such experiments depends on the definition of charge itself, and/or the Coulomb law.“

Unquote

I agree on your overall impression that there is something missing or to say in this way, that the interpretation or even some „ceteris paribus“ conditions are wrong:

Examining Faraday’s Law, it seems not just to be a question about mass as a conductor or induced magnetic fields by a charge or about an electro static potential“ which was theorized, in Faraday’s induction law: a current due to changes in the EM-Field, here magnetic flux ….

Physicists should not separate EM fields as such by magnetic flux and currents in general, or mass from the quantum vacuum – concerning a quantum measurement for a quantum energy state in view to mass or matter or energy in view to mass or stability constraints for matter.

By applying quantum physics we can show that the definition of an electric charge by Noether’s charge is flawed due to the assumption of (gauge) symmetries and the interpretation of an absolute law of conservation of energy, which I do not deny, but the INTERPRETATION depends on the „plane“ of the observation or measurment: what should be conserved within what?

What is energy at all, and what mass? And here appears the antimatter identity (About the Antimatter identity http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/38245/about-the-antimatter-identity – and charge identity) …

This is because mass and energy are concepts by human beings or Einstein mainly for the so called real world in Einstein’s world view of a constant speed of light in the quantum vacuum and E=MC^2, but this fails for Faster than Light phenomena such as Dark Matter, Black Holes or Gravity.

In general, it can be assumed that any deviation to the assumptions of the Standard Model would need a very precise measurement or very high energy fluxes, we may try to apply this for the Planck Scale from the very small to the very large, but more effectively, because we are dealing here with quantum thresholds in photonic mediation: inducing and observing changes in energy potentials or extreme energy scaling and oscillations, spin – spin, spin orbit or angular momentum coupling via Pauli’s Exclusion Principle

MIT Video Lecture by Prof Edmund Bertschinger about General Relativity and Astrophysics – Excerpt

http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/37649/mit-video-lecture-by-prof-edmund-bertschinger-about-general-relativity-and-astrophysics-excerpt

…. the photonic mediation is within spin, charge identity and oscillation of the quantum energy states for the virtuals: a moving charge induces a magnetic field – are we sure about cause and effect here? is the „cause“ that the charge is moving resulting in the induction of a magnetic field or flux?

Within a quantized plane, I assume, it should not be possible (or quantum measurement?!) to tell cause from effect – this we should discuss in further detail!

on quantum level, there is no cause and effect – there cannot be any initial moment within existence – existence needs non -existence, the unobservable universe – it is about a phase transition within fractal dimensions, dimensional transiting ghost virtuals at horizons….and a quantum non quantum threshold.

Inner infinity notion of existence in n-fractal dimensional transitions at horizons

http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/67717/inner-infinity-notion-of-existence-in-n-fractal-dimensional-transitions-at-horizons

 

Oliver Thewalt Hence I agree that “interpretation of such experiments depends on the definition of charge itself, and/or the Coulomb law.”

For a more complete approach we should take into account the antimatter identity and tachyonic Black Hole identity – also in view of unfolding electro-magnetic fields at Yang Mills AdS5 phase space by Black Hole to particle horizons.

More evidence is provided by the discovery of Kobolts or Sprites by NASA in the ionosphere (antimatter, or antimatter in gamma rays, thunderstorms (TGF) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXKt7UVjd-I

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1346102/Scientists-direct-evidence-thunderstorms-blast-antimatter-clouds-space.html

or of hitherto unobserved “fields” in power transmission carriers by Zeptosecond Quantum cameras.

Symmetries in nature are just a concept of the human mind, there cannot be a current flux as such or any direction of a current as such, we should take into account the nuclear shell model and the quark gluon model in view to QCD …. More on that later

Be aware of this:

Comment by Michael Balmer on the Antimatter Thread as an excerpt:

Quote:
Michael Balmer, 01. Jan 2015, 10:21 AM
“ matter,antimatter,dark matter,what about dark antimatter?what puts this all in conflict and turmoil is each persons subscribing to the term,in Susy it is the anti-„partner“ some say the opposite charge sign,some just think it is the evil twin out to get us,the opposite of the normal be it in observation of the negative or the positive it doesn’t matter,the equality of distribution in infinity is a localized field represented by EMFields and Matter fields,in some areas such as Plasma Field of positive ions it is balance to antimatter but antimatter is unstable unshielded at the quantum level and at the macro level though still unstable and radioactive it’s quantity is sufficient to maintain it’s ability not to annihilate at once giving it’s long half life this aided by the so called dark matter field separating the EMField at that point,the dark matter field acts as an insulator against the annihilation process,again,this is not at every point in space of this situation,when researching this on a quantum level the antimatter particles are not separate entities of matter but the same atom carrying it’s anti charge,a proton and electron are by virtue of the opposing charge matter and anti matter to each other and not being the same means nothing…the charge to mass ratio of the electron to the proton will show you this,it may be smaller but pound for pound as the saying goes puts it on an even field,now you can charge conjugate an atom and classify it as antimatter as well…nature does it all the time…this is where the positron appears“
Unquote

MichaeI Balmer, Quote: ”I am still amazed by the LHC (CERN) and that there is still the mystery of more matter than…

Gepostet von Oliver Thewalt am Freitag, 26. April 2013

Mass is in Einstein’s world view responsible for gravity, but mass could not be measured without that there is „somewhere“ a (tachyonic) antimatter identity, the positron, which is not just an anti electron.


Michael Balmer, Quote:

„It has been asserted and accepted that within a nucleus happens a conjugation of protons and neutrons…having said that, when the neutron converts to a proton, is this the loss of mass as well?

…radiation is the particle emitting the charge energy so to speak, to photons and neutrino interaction first is to administer the charge through the weak force, it’s not really creating the proton but one aspect of it…the charge … it is about decay and instability of the nucleus …particles…and existence is based on three…negative ,positive and neutral, with hydrogen with a proton nucleus would be unstable and decay without the neutrality to stabilize it,this is where neutrinos are with Hydrogen,to replace the presence of a neutron.

How and why Quarks Conjugate

Note by Michael Balmer

Gepostet von Michael Balmer am Mittwoch, 17. August 2016

Gepostet von Michael Balmer am Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2015

..the swirl function describes the gluon influence…..

the gluon keeps the quarks bonded, so there must be a neutral influence to prevent annihilation.
the Z boson is the neutrality of the Wf (weak force)

Unquote

is about color charge – and this  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_force#/media/File:Pn_scatter_pi0.png   …

Nuclear force – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The nuclear force (or nucleon–nucleon interaction or residual strong force) is the force between protons and neutrons, subatomic particles that are collectively called nucleons. The nuclear force is responsible for binding protons and neutrons into atomic nuclei. Neutrons and protons are affected by…
as it is asserted here

isospin quantum number

Quote Michael Balmer:

„The nucleus of anti hydrogen is a negative proton
To make it a neative proton the up and down quarks must be reversed
It would be ionized to negative plasma, you can not shield a H1- …. the – e + e is the problem: as in QCD the anti H1 nucleus is unchanged: The swirl function with the neutron and gluons is a strong force phenomenon and only occurs in the nucleus, it is the workings of the gluons in holding the quarks together, it is a QCD not taught. You may find this hard to believe with our current physic because of heisenburg but spin photons is yes but we cannot attain them until intergalactic travel is reached. The spin of the photon is based on the propagation and the energy of the event, the energy may not be carried off entirely by the photon, that is a low energy photon
Which complete conversion of the energy velocity and spin may be higher. Helicity is the direction of spin and angular momentum. But mostly associated with the spin of the electron. Whether it spin left or spins right, in the Pauli it is how the two can occupy the same orbital path. The Higgs is strong force or nucleus event. The Higgs particle assigns mass to itself and other atoms.

The up and down quarks of the proton: One down and two up ,down is neg 1/3 and pos 2/3. The neutron has 2 1/3 and 1 1/3.One up positive and two down negative is a neutron.

It is a neg proton the reverse of the quarks makes it a neutron
A negative proton is the reverse of quarks, the reverse of quarks is a neutron.

The anti hydrogen has a neutron nucleus.
Which is why it will not annihilate.

https://twitter.com/search?q=hixgrid%20%20charge&src=typd

http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/65852/

http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/66316/note-about-imaginary-negative-mass-in-a-beyond-dirac-world-view-–-seen-from-higgs-string-vacua-foldings-bh-states-bh-identity-and-electron-nuclear-shell-model

https://www.facebook.com/groups/202272676479443/permalink/1424433790929986/?hc_location=ufi

Oliver Thewalt What is mass in view to energy – The Problem with the conservation of energy on a universal scale.

by Oliver Thewalt

The problem with conservation of energy on a universal scale turned out to be a tautology, it depends on the definition, but matter and energy, or in those (gauge) concepts, mass and energy are not well defined concepts, because it is decisive to understand, what is mass in view to energy, in a nutshell, regarding Pauli, it is about energy scaling, or „high energy physics“ (what happens to fermions when the energy increases tremendously?) Energy is more about the unobservable universe, the same for matter! I think that Aristoteles was never disproved (horror vacui), because „nothing“ or quantum vacuum is not that it was assumed, the photon or what is visible for us (light!) is just a „seggregation“ of space, it is just a narrow belief to observe something by its „visibility“ and draw conclusions (interpretation)! The visible aspects of life or nature (the „Universe“) are of no importance concerning any ultima ratio or conclusion/general interpretation.

Mass is the same as energy – mass is a unique imprint of an energy folding and bonding in a phase transition within space topology. ~ Oliver Thewalt

Nevertheless, Gauge theories are appropriate in order to develop a technology, but a technology does never exactly what it is supposed to do.

———————–

Mathematician to know: Emmy Noether

http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/…/mathematician-to-know…

Noether’s Theorem in a Nutshell

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/noether.html

The Noether Theorem
http://phys.columbia.edu/~ni…/NewFiles/Noether_theorem.pdf

E. Noether’s Discovery of the Deep Connection Between Symmetries and Conservation Laws

https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9807044

The most beautiful idea in physics – Noether’s Theorem

http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/66587/what-is-mass-in-view-to-energy-the-problem-with-the-conservation-of-energy-on-a-universal-scale

https://www.facebook.com/Science.Network.Hixgrid/posts/1326940554039612

Why don't people recognize that Einstein was dumb like a duck, he was just promoted, abused and protected for his…

Gepostet von Oliver Thewalt am Freitag, 10. März 2017

http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/67283/why-nuclear-fission-is-about-string-vacua-folding-and-topological-bonding-within-a-phase-transition

 

 

We Choose to go to the Moon

Yes, JFK was a partiot, we need patriots for all mankind!

Yes, Richard Feynman, these have been awesome lectures, we need a message for the natural sciences,  a Messenger lecture!

Further reading:

The Metaplane within the unobservable universe – Ramanujan and the matter creation process in the Higgs Field


geschrieben von Sternau \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sep 18

Ich habe neulich mit einem Dozenten von der HTW Saar über die bereits angesprochene Energieproblematik gesprochen. Dieser hat meine Auffassung bestätigt und zudem auf die kürzlichen Blackouts im Stromnetz von Australien hingewiesen:

South Australian blackout blamed on thermal and wind generator failures, plus high demand

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/feb/15/south-australian-blackout-caused-by-demand-and-generator-failures-market-operator-says

In einem Punkt jedoch konnte er meinen Ausführungen noch nicht ganz folgen, oder wollte es nicht:

Die Behauptungen von Tepco, der Kernunfall von Fukushima wäre durch einen Tsunami, Reststrahlung, sowie Vorheizung des Kühlwassers ausgelöst worden können so nicht ganz stimmen.

 




 

Der Zusammenhang zu einem solaren Massenauswurf bzw. Solaren Aktivitäten, einem Large Proton Event (Protonen aus einem CME treffen auf die Magnetosphäre der Erde) und der damit verbunden Störung des (dynamischen) Gleichgewichts der atmosphärischen Elektrostatik (Messwert: Total Electron Content) der Erde zwischen der Ionos- und Litosphäre kann eindrucksvoll durch Meßwerte des Induction Magnetometer von Gakona, AK, 10 march 2011 (UTC), Power Spectral Density (University of Alaska, Projekt HAARP) demonstriert werden:

Hier Werte vom

09. März 2011 http://hixgrid.de/photos/image/37645/haarp-data-02-fukushima-induction-magnetometer-gakona-9-march-2011

Induction Magnetometer Gakona, AK, 10 march 2011 (UTC), Power Spectral Density

10. März 2011 http://www.exogroup.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/10_march_2001_HAARP-e1426849081798.jpg

Oder hier:

http://hixgrid.de/photos/image/37644/haarp-data-fukushima-induction-magnetometer-gakona-10-march-2011




Ähnlich zu einem Blitz oder Thunderstorm (siehe TGF, Terrestrial Gammy Ray Flashes), bei dem Antimaterie (in der alten Dirac Weltsicht) bzw. Gamma Ray Strahlung (Gamma Ray Release) frei wird, und es aus Sicht des Energietransfers, wobei ich die Frage der Gerichtetheit eines „Energieflusses“ noch ausklammere, es sich um einen elektrostatischen Upload, eher von „unten“ (Litosphäre) nach „oben“ (Ionosphäre) handelt, wurde die Atmosphäre nach Entstehung eines präseismischen Epizentrums in der Ionosphäre ca. 1 Stunde vor dem M9 Tohoku-Oki Erdbeben bzw. dem Tsunami „geflasht“ (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Spin-Spin, Spin–Bahn (Orbit) Kopplung, angular momentum (Drehimpuls), sodass eine Moderation der Neutronen durch die Graphitstäbe (oder welches Material dort verwendet wurde, siehe auch Tscherenkow-Stahlung) im Leichtwasserreaktor von Fukushima Daiichi (Fukushima Block I) unmöglich wurde. Tscherenkow Strahlung ist in Wasser (siehe Balmer, Lyman Series) übrigens bläulich, was auf Alpha-Strahler und Gamma-Radiation hindeutet.

 

 

Embrittlement as a result of  hardening of the inside of crystallin grains when exposed to neutron radiation - Fessenheim reactor Typus

Nachtrag: Bei den Reaktortypen von Daiichi Fukushima Block I bis IV handelt sich um Siedewasserreaktoren, welche (Siede)Wasser als Moderations- und Kühlmittel verwenden, sowie in einigen Typen auch Steuerstäbe  zur Moderation der Neutronen aus Borcarbid, Hafnium oder Cadmium.

Daiichi und viele weitere Blöcke des NPP Fukushima sind nie über die Mark I Containerbauweise des BWR 3 Siedewasserreaktors (General Electric) mit Reaktordruckbehälter hinausgekommen. Versprödungen durch Spannungen welche Risse in den Platten erzeugen können machen das Material für eine Notkühlung durch kaltes Wasser unbrauchbar, sodass man sich bei diesem Reaktortyp aus Sicherheitsgründen wegen Gefahr eines Systembruchs durch versehentlich eintretendes Kühlwasser oft entschied, so wie offensichtlich auch in Fukushima, das Kühlwasser anzuheizen, sodass es für eine Notkühlung und Moderation nicht mehr geeignet war.

 

 

Ultraschalluntersuchungen zu Reaktortyp Fessenheim auf Risse durch Versprödungen

Wenn bei TEPCO jemand behauptet, mit einem M9 Erdbeben hätte dort niemand gerechnet, maximal mit M8, so ist dies nicht haltbar: die Gefahr eines M9 gerade in dieser Gegend war wahrscheinlich bereits seit den 1960er Jahren bekannt, spätestens jedoch Anfang der 1970er Jahre.

Siede­wasser­reaktor
BWR/3 (Mark I) – Vergleich Fukushima I Daiichi zu Bauweise in Deutschland https://www.kit.edu/downloads/Japan-Hintergrundinfo_Nr_017_Vergleich_SWR_Deutschland_Japan_00_AH_2.pdf

 

„>

 

Zitat: (Wikipedia https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernkraftwerk_Fukushima_Daiichi )“Die Anlage bezieht ihr Kühlwasser aus dem Meer und hat insgesamt eine Fläche von etwa 3,5 km². Die Blöcke 1/2, 3/4 und 5/6 bilden jeweils eine bauliche Einheit. Ab dem 21. August 2010 waren in Block 3 neben 516 Uran-Brennelementen auch 32 MOX-Brennelemente mit einer Mischung aus Uranoxid und Plutoniumoxid im Einsatz.“ Zitatende

http://www.webcitation.org/5xoqfIVA5

http://www.webcitation.org/5yNe2bPeA

 

Zu diesem Zeitpunkt kein Kommentar dazu!

Helium ist beispielsweise ein Alpha Teilchen. Im Fermi Modell ein kurzer Hinweis:

http://hixgrid.de/file/view/36213/neutrino-fermi-standard-model

Neutrinos and p-violation
http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/36210/

Sonnenaktiviäten und LAI-Kopplung als Ursache des Reaktorunfalls in Fukushima durch das Tohoku-Erdbeben

http://www.exogroup.de/category/lai-coupling-solar-impact-earthquake-precursors-fukushima-tohoku-m9/

Earthquake Precursors and Evidence of Suns impact and triggering

http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/18426/

Wie kann Tepco behaupten, der Kernunfall von Fukushima wäre durch einen Tsunami, Reststrahlung, sowie Vorheizung des Kühlwassers ausgelöst worden?

http://hixgrid.de/bookmarks/view/67519/wie-kann-tepco-behaupten-der-kernunfall-von-fukushima-ware-durch-einen-tsunami-reststrahlung-sowie-vorheizung-des-kuhlwassers-ausgelost-worden-laic-prozess-lai-coupling-cme

Further Reading:

 

 

Atmospheric electrons may act differently before megaquakes

The strongest earthquakes prediction

Geophysicist Kosuke Heki of Hokkaido University in Sapporo, Japan, begins one of his recent articles [1] with the following words:

“Thousands of lives were saved by the “Large Tsunami Warning” announcements of the Japan Meteorological Agency that followed the Tohoku-Oki earthquake of 11 March 2011. A similar alert followed the Central Chile (Maule) earthquake on 27 February 2010. Understanding better how such earthquakes develop might provide even more effective early-warning systems to help mitigate their devastating power.”

Hier noch einige Vorabinformationen welche das Gesagte unterlegen werden:

Why in a beyond Dirac World View the positron is not the anti-electron

http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/67510/why-in-a-beyond-dirac-world-view-the-positron-is-not-the-anti-electron

Preliminary Information about the Matter Creation Process in the Higgs-Field

http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/67498/preliminary-information-about-the-matter-creation-process-in-the-higgs-field

Folgeabschätzung der Erhöhung des Anteils an regenerativen Energien am Energiemix für Deutschland

 

http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/65906/folgeabschatzung-der-erhohung-des-anteils-an-regenerativen-energien-am-energiemix-fur-deutschland

Dies sind Initialinformationen, da die Dinge erst verstanden sein müssen, bevor wir fortfahren, doch ich glaube nicht, dass die BRICS Staaten oder die globale Entwicklung darauf warten werden, bis man diese Dinge hier versteht, die Solar(zellen)industrie existiert in Deutschland nicht mehr, doch um was es hier geht ist noch wesentlich mehr!

 


Wie können wir den Energiesektor für neue Technologien öffnen um die Energie- und Stromversorgung Deutschlands zu sichern?

http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/66241/wie-konnen-wir-den-energiesektor-fur-neue-technologien-offnen-um-die-energie-und-stromversorgung-deutschlands-zu-sichern

Sincerely Yours

Oliver Thewalt, im Mai 2017

1. Vorsitzender des Neogrid e.V.

Theoretical Physics | Quantum Biology

Dark Matter Research Cluster

Note about imaginary negative mass in a beyond Dirac world view

http://hixgrid.de/blog/view/66316/note-about-imaginary-negative-mass-in-a-beyond-dirac-world-view-%E2%80%93-seen-from-higgs-string-vacua-foldings-bh-states-bh-identity-and-electron-nuclear-shell-model

 

 Oliver Thewalt – About me – short Bio

http://hixgrid.de/pages/view/66565/oliver-thewalt-about-me-short-bio

Theoretical Physics for new energy – IT – Energy Cluster
http://hixgrid.de/groups/profile/67436/theoretical-physics-for-new-energy-it-energy-cluster

geschrieben von Sternau \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sep 18

Solange ich eine Vermieterbescheinigung für das Jobcenter vorlegen muss,

kann ich schlecht eine Wohnung finden!

Die Frage zur beruflichen Situation war schon nicht legal,

doch welchen Sinn hat es, dort keine näheren Angaben zu machen, was mein Recht wäre,

wenn ich sowieso eine Vermieterbescheinigung, ausgefüllt vom Vermieter, beim Jobcenter vorlegen muss?

 

Sehr geehrter Herr Fritz,

 

Wissen Sie was Diskriminierungsverbot ist, und was das strafrechtlich zur Folge hat?

…. und da ich beruflich hauptsächlich über meine Bildungsthemen mit Studenten zu tun habe,
offenbart das Ihre tatsächliche Gesinnung.

Das wird sehr peinlich für Sie!

 

 

Hallo Herr Thewald,
aufgrund der Altersstruktur der übrigen Mietparteien in diesem Haus (vorwiegend Studenten) denken wir, dass die Wohnung für Sie dann doch nicht das Richtige ist.
Wir sagen darum den Besichtigungstermin hiermit ab.
Wir wünschen Ihnen weiterhin viel Erfolg bei der Wohnungssuche!
Viele Grüße und einen schönen Feiertag,
J. Fritz

 

Hallo Herr Fritz,

ich bin ** Jahre alt, derzeit beim Jobcenter Arbeitssuchend gemeldet und wohne ****.

Viele Grüsse

Hallo Herr Thewald,
Ganz entspannt reichen: Alter, Arbeitgeber, berufliche Situation und derzeitige Anschrift.
Viele Grüße
J. Fritz

Von meinem iPad gesendet

 

Hallo Herr Fritz,

ich erzähle Ihnen sehr gerne was über meine Person.

Da ich jedoch nicht genau weiß, was Sie von mir wissen wollen,
schlage ich vor, dass wir das interaktiv über das Telefon machen.

Geben Sie mir einfach Ihre Telefonnummer und ich rufe Sie heute oder
morgen abend mal ganz bequem an.

Viele Grüße

 

Hallo Herr Thewald,

Wir haben gerade gesehen, Sie es bisher noch versäumt haben, uns weitere Angaben zu Ihrer Person mitzuteilen.
Bitte holen Sie das noch nach, da dies Voraussetzung für den Besichtigungstermin ist.
Eine endgültige Bestätigung des Termin erhalten Sie dann nach Eingang der Angaben.

Viele Grüße,

Joachim Fritz

Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:

Von: Joachim Fritz <***@aol.com
Datum: 14. August 2017 um 10:33:21 MESZ

Betreff: Re: Wohnung Mozartstraße Saarbrücken

Hallo Herr Thewald,

Dann sehen wir uns am Mittwoch um 16:00 Uhr in der Mozartstraße 15 in 66111 Saarbrücken. Wir treffen uns vor dem Hauseingang.

Bis dahin viele Grüße und einen schönen Feiertag,
Joachim Fritz

 

Hallo Herr Fritz,

ja, den Termin am Mittwoch, den 16.08.2017 um 16:00 kann ich wahrnehmen.

Allerdings müsste ich dann die Hausnummer in der Mozartstr. wissen.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

 

 

Hallo Herr Thewald!

Wir können Ihnen für den genannten Mittwoch, den 16.08.2017, auch noch einen Termin um 16:00 Uhr anbieten.

Bitte machen Sie noch ein paar weiterführende Angaben zu Ihrer Person und teilen Sie uns mit, ob Sie den Termin um 16:00 wahrnehmen können.

Viele Grüße,

Joachim Fritz

 

Hallo Familie Fritz,

ich würde gerne einen Besichtigungstermin für kommende Woche für diese Wohnung in
der Mozartstr. wahrnehmen.

Wäre auch ein Termin Nachmittags ab 16 Uhr möglich in dieser Woche?

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

 

Hallo Herr Thewald!

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Interesse an der Wohnung in der Mozartstraße.

Gerne können wir einen Besichtigungstermin vereinbaren.

Vorab noch zu Ihrer Information:

Die zu hinterlegende Kaution bei der Anmietung der Wohnung beträgt 900,- €.

Zur Wohnung dazu gehört – wie in der Anzeige auch schon dargestellt – der Tiefgaragenstellplatz, der grundsätzlich zusammen mit der Wohnung vermietet wird.

Hausmeisterservice (Treppenhausreinigung) ist ebenfalls noch im Mietpreis/Nebenkosten enthalten, natürlich auch alle anderen üblichen Kosten wie Wasser-, Heizkostenpauschale, Müllentsorgung etc.

Ein Vertrag mit einem Strom-Anbieter ist separat und individuell vom Mieter abzuschließen, ebenso wenn gewünscht mit einen Internet-Anbieter.

Als Besichtigungstermin können wir Ihnen den kommenden Mittwoch, den 16.08.2017 um 11:30 Uhr anbieten.

Bitte teilen Sie uns mit, ab Sie den Termin wahrnehmen können. Wir senden Ihnen dann die genaue Anschrift der Wohnung zu.

 

Viele Grüße,

Dr.med. Annemarie Gestier-Fritz & Joachim Fritz

geschrieben von Sternau \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jun 15

Das Atomkraftwerk (NPP, Nuclear Power Plant) Fukushima Daiichi (Fukushima I) konnte nach offiziellen Angaben wegen den Auswirkungen des Tsunami nach dem Tōhoku-Erdbeben am 11. März 2011 um 14:46:23 Uhr Ortszeit (M9 Earthquake, Prof. Kosuke Heki, Japan M9, atmospheric quake, LAIC) weder heruntergekühlt noch heruntergefahren werden.

Die tatsächliche Ursache für die Unmöglichkeit des Herunterkühlens bzw. Herunterfahrens der Nuklearanlage von Fukushima-Daiichi zur Verhinderung der drohenden Kernschmelze (Super-GAU) ist jedoch nicht in den Auswirkungen des Tsunami zu finden, sondern in einem Prozess welcher durch Sonnenaktivitäten VOR dem Erdbeben ausgelöst wurde, dem LAI-Coupling Prozess (Litosphären-Atmosphären-Ionosphären Kopplung, LAIC-Process).

LAI coupling Kamogawa 2004

LAI coupling Kamogawa 2004

 




 

Übersetzung aus dem Englischen eines Zitats von Torsten P. Kersten:

„Zu viele Menschen sind gestorben, da sie diese Lektion ignoriert haben: der physikalische Hintergrund für die Magnetfeld-Störung, ausgelöst durch den LAIC-Prozess (Lithosphären-Atmosphären Ionosphären Kopplung) und der nuklear-magnetischen Resonanz in magnetischen Feldern sowie den Auswirkungen auf die Energie und Spin der Elementarteilchen.

Mit sich ändernden Orbitalbahnen der Elektronen um den Atomkern wird der Zerfallsprozess in einem Atomkraftwerk unter diesen Bedingungen zu erhöhter Strahlung führen…. (Temperatur, Druck, Tscherenkow Strahlung (Pawel Alexejewitsch Cherenkov)…).

Weiterhin zeigt das Interview mit dem japanischen Experten, dass das atmosphärische Phänomen (zeitlich) VOR dem Erdbeben aufgezeichnet wurde. Diese Tatsache ist das stärkste Argument, von dem die HAARP-Verschwörungsanhänger sprechen.

Dennoch wurden diese Ereignisse klar erkennbar durch Sonnenaktivitäten ausgelöst! Dieses aufgezeichnete atmosphärische Phänomen wurde als co-seismisches Ereignis bezeichnet.

Jedoch zeigt die Aussage des japanischen Experten sehr deutlich, dass es VOR (in front of) dem Erdbeben stattfand, und dass diese Aussage mit der USGS Experten-Aussagen über die LAI-Kopplung übereinstimmt.

Induction Magnetometer Gakona, 10 march 2011 (UTC), Power Spectral Density

Induction Magnetometer Gakona, 10 march 2011 (UTC), Power Spectral Density

Die logische Konsequenz ergibt sich aus den Eigenschaften von geladenen Teilchen und deren Auswirkungen auf die

a.) globalen elektromagnetischen Feldvariationen (bis zu elektromagnetischen Stürmen, auch geomagnetische Stürme)

b.) das lokale Magnetfeld, welches sich aufbauen, und sogar von einem Wirbel bestehend aus einem von der Ionosphäre herunterströmenden Teilchenstrom, „geflasht“ werden kann. Wie ein unsichtbarer Blitzschlag, aber es handelt sich immer noch um pure Ladung.

Die LAI-Kopplung beschreibt, wie solare, hochgeladene Teilchenstürme (Large Proton Event oder Solar Particle Event durch z.B. Coronal Mass Ejections – Anmerkung: Wenn Protonen auf die äussere Hülle der Erdatmosphäre treffen, dann annihilieren sie mit Photonen, sodass man entgegen den Aussagen dieses Artikels in Wirklichkeit Positronen misst und nicht Protonen) – einen elektrostatischen Upload in der Lithosphäre auslösen, welcher sich aus zeitlicher Sicht VOR dem Erdbeben aufbaut.

Dies kann mit modernen Instrumenten beobachtet werden und wird in der Wissenschaft beschrieben. Dies ist Teil der bekannten Wissenschaft und Forschung in akademischen Kreisen, sodass Ihre Regierung schon Wochen vorher weiss, wann und wo sich ein signifikantes Erdbeben ereignen kann.

LAI Coupling: a process of charge exchange between lithosphere, atmosphere and ionosphere as described by hundreds of scientific studies and already part of USGS and NOAA’s 2008 training seminars for seismic experts on remote sensing via satellites.

Most prominent example: the tracked ‚atmospheric quake‘ in front of the Japan M 9, published by Prof. Kosuke Heki, of Hokkaido University in Sapporo, Japan:

Quote: „A tantalizing question for seismologists and atmospheric scientists is whether this high-altitude electron bump, if confirmed by other studies, is a true early-warning signal for devastating earthquakes. Geophysicist Kosuke Heki of Hokkaido University in Sapporo, Japan, who reports the suggestive buildups in a new scientific paper, thinks that it could be.

“The claim that earthquakes are inherently unpredictable might not be true, at least for M9 [magnitude 9] class earthquakes,” Heki writes in an article accepted for publication in Geophysical Research Letters, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.

The study suggests that the total electron content, or TEC, in the ionosphere starts increasing as much as eight percent above background levels prior to massive earthquakes, with the biggest effect above the rupturing fault.

The electron buildup before the Japan earthquake started 40 minutes before disaster struck.

The time involved in retrieving and analyzing the TEC data would make it difficult to use the information as a potential earthquake warning, the researcher says. For some scientists, even the notion of an earthquake precursor is controversial. Another earthquake expert, not involved in the study, said the data is interesting and should be studied in the future, but he is not completely convinced that change in TEC is an earthquake precursor.

Days after the devastating magnitude 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake struck Japan, Heki downloaded data from satellites that are part of the GPS Earth Observation Network. He was interested in oscillations of the TEC when acoustic waves echo from the epicenter into the ionosphere.

“I thought I’d see a very strong signal after this earthquake,” Heki says. “And in the course of working on that, I found something strange happened.” The Total Electron Content (Total Electron Content) was higher before the expected oscillations occurred than it was after the oscillations, so he took another look at the raw data from the GPS satellites. “ Unquote

Ionospheric electron enhancement preceding
the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake
, Geophysical Research Letters

LAI Coupling = Litosphere – Atmosphere – Ionosphere Coupling (Litosphären-Atmosphären-Ionosphären Kopplung, LAIC-Prozess).

Die erhöhte Strahlung erzeugt folglich mehr thermische Energie. Wenn nun die Kühlsysteme unter einem Überdruck arbeiten, dann funktioniert weder die Abschaltung noch das Herunterkühlen des Reaktors.

Pictures and Data Proof for Fukushima LAI Coupling (Litosphere - Atmosphere - Ionosphere Coupling)

Pictures and Data Proof for Fukushima LAI Coupling (Litosphere – Atmosphere – Ionosphere Coupling)

Die Anlage war nicht mehr kühlbar. Kurze Zeit nach dem Erdbeben ging die Strahlung außerhalb der Anlage in Richtung Mond, wie die HAARP Daten zeigen. Der Tsunami traf die Anlage jedoch erst eine 3/4 Stunde nach dem Erdbeben!

Die Aussage, der Tsunami hätte das Herunterkühlen der Anlage verhindert, war eine Lüge!

Research in Monitoring Earthquakes by Dr. Ouzounov 2007

Research in Monitoring Earthquakes by Dr. Ouzounov 2007

Kommentar in englischer Sprache von Torsten P. Kersten (ca.2012):

Quote:
„the word ‚coupling‘ decribes in technical language the transmission of power via an axis. every motor knows this concept and your car would only drive in one ‚gear‘ if mankind wouldn’t understand ‚coupling‘.

so we are talking of a transmission from Ionosphere, where the cme’s and hard radiation hit on the geomagnetic shielding, a buffer zone, called atmosphere ( like the oil in your gearhousing ) and a second ‚black-box system‘ with it’s entry at the litho (stone) sphere.

The concept of how ‚energy‘ or Solar PULSE is transmitted and exchanged between different media …


two solar proton events in that perieod btw, so we can assume that we had a quite active sun … two Proton events within a month, this is large sunspot action ….

data:
Feb 17/2020 Feb 17/2205 31 Feb 16/0200 X2/2B N15E48 1574
Apr 03/1600 Apr 03/2310 45

solar proton event 1 happened on Feb 17th 1979 at 20:20 h, maximum level was at 22:05, the corelated cme was on Feb 16th at 02:00 UTC and it was an X 2 event from the region N 15 E 48. The proton flux particle count was 31 pfu @ > 10MeV. The sunspot number was 1574

event 2 only comes with the date, beginning Apr 3rd at 16:00 with a maximum at 23:10, 45 pfu@>10MeV
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/ftpdir/indices/SPE.txt

So, here you can see, that the solar activity background level was already ‚hazardous‘ in terms of what we know about the solar tectonic coupling.

To impact on earth and affect the radiation and thus the heat and pressure development in a nuclear power plant a solar flare must have emitted on 25th to be ahead of the event at the nuclear power plant heat/pressure rise.

This is the report on the the 1979 march 25th solar flare:
High-resolution X-ray spectra of the 1979 March 25 solar flare
Here is the abstract:

according to this article the march 25th flare was an X 1 event, which started at shortly before 18:00 at about W 10 N 77.

If I argue with the solar impact on the nuclear catastrophes, there must have been solar action, right? Here is the evidence for this case.

Fukushima:
the solar background for Fukushima is interesting to observe. I did that online and – live -. I saw the solar proton event, triggered by an M 3 event and warned for a big one comming.

I listed the potential candidates Asia Japan was on top of the list with few other locations. I still can not understand how NASA and USGS did not warn.

You can look at it if you

a.) look up the solar proton event list, posted above,

…and

b.) when you observe the cme activity for the period on LASCO C 3. My tip: look at it in 512 resolution first and see a larger chunk of the TIME line. start feb 18th …

The X-ray chart showed an X event, I saved a copy ….

we cannot control nuclear reactors with sudden magnetic disturbances impacting on them. Too many people are dead for ignoring this lesson.

the pysical background for the magnetic field disturbance, released by LAIC process (Lithosphere Atmosphere Ionosphere Coupling) and the article on nuclear resonance in magnetic fields and the impact on the subatomic particle speed and spin. With altering orbits around the atom, the decay process in a nuclear powerplant will result under this conditions in increased radiation …. (heat, pressure…)

as well as the interview with the japanese expert who states that the atmospheric phenomenon was tracked ahead of the earthquake. This fact is the strongest argument the HAARP conspiracy believers are talking about. Nevertheless, the impact was clearly a solar caused event. The tracked atmospheric phenomenon is called a co-seismic event. But the statement from the japanese expert clearly says it was in front of the earthquake and this statement matches with USGS expert statements on the LAI Coupling. The logical implication is the properties of the charged particles and their impact on the a.) global electromagnetic field variations (down to electromagnetic storm) and b.) they local magnetic field which can build up and be ‚flashed‘ by a vortex of downstreaming particles. Like an invisible lightning, but still charge.

The LAI Coupling describes how solar, highly charged particle storms release static upload in the lithosphere, which builds up in front of earthquakes. This process is observable with contemporary instruments and science. The process is regular science, published, part of the acedemic research and your government komws weeks ahead that a significant earthquake builds up and where.

Surprise comes with deep rising magma and it’s charge and impact on the magnetic and static energy field conditions along certain tectonic active areas. Chernobyl for instance was build exaclty on top of an randomly active fault line. (often the rivers have their beds there and water is needed for the cooling of the plant). There is already credible evidence, that Chernobyl was affected with it’s accident by similar pysical laws.

‎“The satellite technology (remote sensing, ionospheric plasma measurements, GPS TEC) provided opportunity to clarify the physics of the processes chain, occurring during the earthquake process and which we name Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere (LAI) coupling. The LAI model created recently, permitted to unite different groups of scientists working in different areas by the common physical mechanism which is able to explain geochemical, atmospheric, geoelectric, thermal and ionospheric anomalies observed within the time interval few weeks before the seismic shock within the area called earthquake preparation area. The LAI model permitted to change the approach of the modern earthquake science to the so called physical precursors of earthquakes. The LAI coupling could explain why some time ago some EM phenomena were considered as not a precursors and possibility for their use in short term earthquake prediction was doubt in great extend by the whole community. Recent major earthquakes rendered to us the dataset completely supporting our model. The only element which is still questioned is the triggering mechanism which will also be discussed in the present paper. “

Unquote

Der Ausstieg Deutschlands aus der Atomenergie hängt mit diesen Erkenntnissen zusammen.

Die NASA zensiert Erdbebendaten um diese Vorgänge zu verschleiern.

Quote: Torsten P. Kersten: this chart is the centerpiece of, what they admit.

LAIC Process

Litosphere – Atmosphere – Ionosphere Coupling

 

I will put in a note that a.) explains the role the geomagnetic shielding and sun have in this game and I will show you why the northern pole hurries off it’s former equinox.
I will show you some more evidence: from the nuclear testing to the early subsea tectonics starting with the tests up to Mr. Obama attending the start for last journey of Endeavor and it’s incredible costly instrument, a mass spectrometer calibrated in CERN and why this was more important than the wedding of a young british prince, who is befriended with the Obama family. They had their ticket for the party.

I will show you how and in which big size our public perception is manipulated and why the western idustrial societies systems we believed to be ok are unjust and killing. And I show you the long term aproach of the US to this Crime. Starting in the second World War.

In the upper picture you can see in the top right corner a picture from Sun and a coronal mass ejection. You can see a cloud wich is named ‚electron density change‘. You can see a flash below the lithosphere (the stone sphere) the words ‚discharge‘ and ‚Electrokinetic Microfracture‘.

There you are … a system with charge and flash. Particle Physics. Easy to understand if I tell you the story without frills.

And you should take 2.5 hours TIME and listen to the story NASA tells to a top gremia

Before seeing this prensentation, you need to install microsoft silverlight, witch is done automaticly. the presentation focuses on all the anomolies in our solar system and the impacts on earth.
the presentation comes from Delft University of Technologi in Holland

http://collegerama.tudelft.nl/mediasite/SilverlightPlayer/Default.aspx?peid=c29550a872814c2a9e7ba28ac0c7d1e61d

Thanks to Pamela Carr and her solar and celestial bodies watch dog group.“
Unquote

Autor dieses Blog-Post: Oliver Thewalt, Neogrid e.V.  Hixgrid.de Theoretical Physics | Dark Matter Research Cluster

Weiterführende Links:
Contemporary Science: LAI Coupling, earthquake precursors and prewarning possibilities

Earthquake Precursors and Evidence of Suns impact & triggering

Weiterführende Links:

1 .Gesamtelektroneninhalt, TEC https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_electron_content

2. Total Electron Content USA USA

3. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

4. Magnetic Reconnection

5. Onset of Fast Magnetic Reconnection

6. Ionospheric and Atmospheric Remote Sensing http://iono.jpl.nasa.gov/

7. CME Earthquake Torsten P Kersten:

Zitat:“

„Earthpointed CME always means energy douche, even on energy channels you haven’t heard of. Invisible, but able to trigger earthquakes, so the official public statement of an USGS expert on LAI Coupling“

8. Explanation of Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling System Anomalous Geophysical Phenomena on the Basis of the Model of Generation of Electromagnetic Emission Detected Before Earthquake

9. Pictures and Data Proof for Fukushima – LAI-coupling post.

10.  Magnetic reconnection at Sun surface, Sun Spots (and Pauli’s Exclusion Principle)

11. The Earth’s Internal Structure

12. Understanding the Magnetic Sun – NASA/JPL

13. Delving inside Earth from Space

14. Earthquake Precursors and Evidence of Suns impact and triggering


Further Reading:
The strongest earthquakes prediction

Geophysicist Kosuke Heki of Hokkaido University in Sapporo, Japan, begins one of his recent articles [1] with the following words:

“Thousands of lives were saved by the “Large Tsunami Warning” announcements of the Japan Meteorological Agency that followed the Tohoku-Oki earthquake of 11 March 2011. A similar alert followed the Central Chile (Maule) earthquake on 27 February 2010. Understanding better how such earthquakes develop might provide even more effective early-warning systems to help mitigate their devastating power.”

Crustal deformation causes several geophysical phenomena. Vertical deformation of boundaries between layers with different density (as between the sea floor and the base of the Earth’s crust, called by geophysicists Moho) and changes in rock density around the tectonic fault produce subtle changes in gravity. The 26 December 2004 earthquake in Sumatra-Andaman region was the first earthquake whose gravity change was detected by satellite gravimetry. The 27 February 2010 earthquake in Central Chile was the second and the 11 March 2011 earthquake in Japan is the recent one. The combination of dense detector networks in these regions and the suite of new techniques provide today a picture of earthquakes and their dynamics never before available.

Heki`s investigations begun with his analysis of the variations of total electron content (TEC) in inonsphere over Japan during 2008. Five large earthquakes with magnitude M>6.8 occurred around the Japanese Islands between April and September 2008. Knowing that the decisive role in the ionosphere state is performed by space weather effects, his team has compared the estimated TEC values with such parameters as time series of the vertical component of the interplanetary magnetic field, UV solar radiation, and a corresponding index of the geomagnetic activity [2]. Though he was forced to conclude that it is rather difficult to find evident correlation between the observed TEC anomalies and the five large earthquakes, he was still optimistic writing:

“Our results do not disprove the possibility of precursory phenomena but show the difficulties in identifying earthquake precursors in the ionosphere TEC on the background of TEC changes produced by space weather effects, even during solar minimum.”

In order to collect more experience, Heki has even investigated the tracks of ballisic missiles crossing the upper layers of the Earth`s atmosphere [3], using the dense array of global positioning system (GPS) receivers over Japan to study ionospheric disturbances.
The newest study by Heki and his group suggests that changes in the ionospheric electromagnetism could be used as a precursor for the strongest earthquakes (at least to those with magnitude larger than 8).

Kate Ramsayer, science writer of the American Geophysical Union (AGU), describes the discovery on the AGU-blog [4]:

“The study suggests that the total electron content, or TEC, in the ionosphere starts increasing as much as eight percent above background levels prior to massive earthquakes, with the biggest effect above the rupturing fault. The electron buildup before the Japan earthquake started 40 minutes before disaster struck.
Days after the devastating magnitude 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake struck Japan, Heki downloaded data from satellites that are part of the GPS Earth Observation Network. He was interested in oscillations of the TEC when acoustic waves echo from the epicenter into the ionosphere.
“I thought I’d see a very strong signal after this earthquake,” Heki says. “And in the course of working on that, I found something strange happened.” The TEC was higher before the expected oscillations occurred than it was after the oscillations, so he took another look at the raw data from the GPS satellites.
But changes in total electron content aren’t rare, Heki says. Solar flares and other ionospheric disturbances can cause fluctuations. So he looked at TEC prior to other major earthquakes, including the 2010 Chile earthquake.
“I saw almost the same signature as the Tohoku earthquake,” Heki says. And although there were fewer GPS stations operational during the 2004 Sumatra quake, those showed a similar TEC anomaly. Smaller quakes, around magnitude 8.0 and below, don’t appear to have the same TEC increases.
It’s currently not feasible to use total electron content as a warning system for giant quakes, Heki says. There is a dense network of GPS satellites, especially over earthquake-prone areas like Japan, California and Indonesia, but the organization running the GPS network over Japan uploads the data once every few hours. And it takes time to analyze the data and weed out other disturbances to the total electron content like solar flares.
The next step for researchers could be to both determine what causes a change in TEC prior to earthquakes, as well as establish additional measuring stations on the ground to monitor the electric field.”

Naturics (being based on the Unified Physics) is able to do this next step just now and explain “what causes a change in TEC prior to earthquakes” (compare in our Hot News the point: “The next step towards our understanding of the origin of life”).
______________
[1] “A Tale of Two Earthquakes” by Kosuke Heki in 17 JUNE 2011 VOL 332 SCIENCE
(http://www.ep.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~heki/pdf/Science-2011-Heki-1390-1.pdf)
[2] “Vertical TEC over seismically active region during low solar activity”
by Elvira Astafyeva, Kosuke Heki in Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics73 (2011) 1643–1652
(http://www.ep.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~heki/pdf/Elvira_Heki_JATP2011.pdf)
[3] “Ionospheric holes made by ballistic missiles from North Korea detected with a Japanese dense GPS array” by Masaru Ozeki and Kosuke Heki in Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115, A09314, 2010
(http://www.ep.sci.hokudai.ac.jp/~heki/pdf/OzekiHeki_JGR2010.pdf)
[4] “Atmospheric electrons may act differently before megaquakes” posted 14 September 2011 by Kate Ramsayer, American Geophysical Union (AGU) science writer

 

geschrieben von Sternau \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jun 15

Das deutsche Energie-Projekt zur Förderung regenerativer Energien ist eine Katastrophe: Solarstrom und Wind produzieren Energie im Sommer und vor allem in den nördlichen Teilen Deutschlands, jedoch wird Strom vor allem im Winter und in den südlichen Teilen Deutschlands benötigt. Nun plant die Bundesregierung Höchst-Spannungsträger zu errichten um Strom aus dem Norden Deutschlands in den Süden zu transportieren! Das ist peinlich für die deutsche Energiepolitik!

Der Klimawandel und die Erderwärmung sind darüber hinaus nicht hauptsächlich von Menschen verursacht, sondern durch Sonnenzyklen und kosmische Strahlung.




 

Nach der Cosmic-Rays Climate Theorie von Henrik Svensmark (Sun Climate Group, Danish National Space Center, seit 2004:  Centre for Sun Climate Research, NSI) wird das magnetische Feld der Sonne stärker. Dieser Prozeß vermindert den Einfall kosmischer Strahlung auf die Erde. Da kosmische Strahlung die Wolkenbildung anregt, vermindert sich die Wolkenbildung in der Erdatmosphäre. Konsequenterweise erhöht sich die Sonnenbestrahlung auf die Erde und setzt Methan und damit Kohlendioxid aus z.B. Permafrostböden frei.

 

svenmar cosmic rays climate theory

Henrik Svensmark: Cosmic Rays Climate Theory

Man hat schon im Winter Probleme eine Netzfrequenz von 50 Hertz Aufrecht zu erhalten, und die Bundesregierung verbietet daher, Kohle- und Gaskraftwerke im Winter abzuschalten. Außerdem mussten manchmal Strom-Kontingente an der Leipziger Strombörse (EEX) unter Herstellungskosten angeboten werden. Zudem plant z.B. die Türkei ein Atomkraftwerk (Atomspaltung!) im Jahr 2017 zu bauen, und Frankreich will seine AKWs behalten, wobei sich viele nahe der Grenze zu Deutschland befinden, z. B. in Cattenom.

Was passiert denn, wenn europäische Nachbarn Deutschlands weiterhin AKWs bauen, teilweise in der Nähe zu Deutschland? Wenn dies geschieht, dann wird Deutschland langfristig gezwungen sein, Strom-Kontingente im Winter zu importieren.

 

 

Ansätze zur Lösung von Energieproblemen
Was also tun? AKWs sind nicht sicher, wegen z.B. LAI-Coupling (Litosphären-Atmosphären-Ionosphären-Kopplung), wobei das Problem der Endlagerung des Atommüll zu einem Disaster (Asse, Gorleben) mutiert ist. Eine Möglichkeit besteht in der Einsparung von Energie, z.B. durch effizientere CPUs bzw. der Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE).

Kernfusion
Aber welche Energieformen sonst? Modelle zur Kernfusion (Hot Fusion: ITER (Tokamak), Dense Plasma Focus, Sandia’s Z-Machine (Laser Pulsed Fusion), Wendelstein 7-X (Stellarator) sind nicht ausgereift, bilden aber einen Hoffnungsträger für zukünftige Energieversorgung, da es genügend Ausgangsstoffe auf der Erde (z.B. schwerer Wasserstoff in Form von Deuterium oder Tritium (Wasserstoffisotope), welche i.d.R. jedoch erst gewonnen werden sowie Lithium) oder dem Mond (Helium-3) gibt, wobei die entstehenden radioaktiven Endstoffe eine vergleichsweise sehr kurze Halbwertszeit aufweisen. Darüber hinaus ist der Prozess in hohem Maße exotherm, je nach technologischer Realisierung.

Kernfusion als Sun-on-Earth Ansatz oder allgemein die Plasmaphysik sind zudem veraltete Konzepte, teilweise auch überholt oder widerlegt.

Man kann sich das auch in vereinfachter Form so verdeutlichen: ein Mensch produziert im Schnitt mehr Energie als ein m^3 (Kubikmeter) Sonne, da die Wahrscheinlichkeit der Fusion eines Wasserstoffatoms in der Sonne so gering ist, sodass ein Proton im Schnitt (on Average) ca. 1 Milliarde Jahre benötigt, um zu fusionieren.

In der Sonne funktioniert dieser Prozeß jedoch auf Grund des vergleichsweise extrem hohen Volumens der Sonne (Zitat aus Nuclear Fusion: Bringing a star down to Earth (A. Kirk) „On average one proton fuses every billion years and a 1m3 volume of the Sun only produces 30 W of heat, which is less than the average human. The Sun works because it is so big. The advantage of such a slow process is that the lifetime of the Sun is sufficiently long (~ 10 Billion years) that humans have been able to evolve sufficiently to criticise its efficiency!).

Vielversprechender wären Ansätze aus einer Neubewertung der Quantenchromodynamik (QCD), z.B: über das Verständnis aus der Higgs-Feld Theorie, der Charge Identity (-> Antimaterie), des Black Hole <-> Particle Bezugs und Yang-Mills in AdS5 Phase Space in Bezug zur QCD und Quarks über Gluonen.

Bisherige Konzepte wie beispielsweise über ITER (Tokamak, DEMO) oder Wendelstein 7-X sind zudem unzureichend und überteuert, da z.B. die Stabilität des Plasma-Confinements noch zu kurz ist (Tokamak), oder weil die Bedingungen auf der Erde (Sun-on-Earth Ansatz) zu einer ungünstigen Veränderung des Fusionsansatzes im Vergleich zu einem Stern zwingen.

Laser-pulsed Ansätze bedeuten zwar einen Fortschritt, jedoch gilt es im Besonderen die Forschungen im Bereich QCD, Strong Force und Quark-Gluonen Interaktionen zu intensivieren. Darüberhinaus findet der Kernfusionsprozess in einem Stern unter Bedingungen im Raum-Vakuum statt. Beispielsweise existieren (quasi) Singularitäten nicht nur bei Schwarzen Löchern, sondern auch bei Teilchen wie Protonen.

Darüberhinaus sind verschiedene weitere Zusammenhänge noch unzureichend geklärt: Welche Rolle spielen Dunkle Materie, die Feinstruktrukonstante (Alpha) oder Neutrinos? Alpha ist nicht konstant, sondern variiert. CERN hat bestätigt, daß Energie (Quantum Energy States /siehe auch: das Quark-Gluon Plasma) vergleichbar ist zum Verhalten einer perfekten Flüssigkeit (Supra Fluidity). Die Dichte des relativistischen Quanten-Vakuums verändert sich, vergleichbar zu einer Luftblase unter Wasser, in der Aphelion und Perihelion Phase (vgl. Zitat von Charles A. Laster, String Theory Development Group: „I propose that the vacuum energy, treated as a perfect fluid, has a density governed by Relativity and the perfect fluid deviations of Einsteins Field Equations. Thus the density of the vacuum is higher closer to the sun, which affect to total energy level of an atom and hence its decay rate. In fact, any energy field, particle collisions, so on, can affect the value of the vacuum energy density within that region of space. Thus the vacuum energy truly is a quantum problem as currently calculated, giving predictions far from observation. This way of calculating the vacuum energy should give better results when compared with observation.“ Zitat Ende

Dunkle Materie existiert im Higgs-Feld: dort startet der Materieentstehungsprozess. Die Frage entsteht, warum es eine Abweichung zu den Vorhersagen bei den Experimenten zum Nachweis von Neutrinos in den Neutrinofallen gibt? Neutrinos oszillieren, sie besitzen sowohl eine Masse als auch eine Ruhemasse. Neutrinos scheinen ihr eigener Anti-Partner zu sein. Sie stehen mit Photonen (tachyonic di-photon super partner pair to micro Black Hole) im Zusammenhang mit der Mediierung des Quantum Foams über die lokale Planck-Density in Bezug zur Feinstrukturkonstante Alpha (siehe z.B. Solar Neutrino). Denn Neutrinos sind Quantenteilchen, welche über Majorana- und Weyl-States (Black Hole Matter-Antimatter Lensing), die Verbindung zu Masse als Quantum Energy States darstellen.

Exkurs in die theoretische Physik: Phasen von Energie und Materie
Der Übergang von Materie zu Energie könnte damit im Zusammenhang stehen, da es verschiedene Phasen von Materie und Energie gibt, welche in Bezug zur Lichtgeschwindigkeit stehen. Diese wirkt wie ein Grenz- oder Schwellenwert (Threshold) zwischen Materie und Energie, oder mathematischer ausgedrückt, vergleichbar der Null, deren obere und untere Grenzen ins Unendliche (bzw. minus Unendlich) gestreckt werden können, denn aus Sicht der Physik ist „Nichts“ (oder 0) nicht Nichts, sondern kann interpretiert werden durch die Verteilung der Nullstellen der Zeta-Funktion von Riemann, welche Verbindungen zu den Existenzbedingungen von stabiler Materie aufweisen.




Quantum Gravity könnte genau dort entstehen, in der Phase zwischen dem Übergang zu Energie und Materie, wenn Teilchen den Event-Horizon (Apparent Horizons –> Super Yang Mills in AdS5 phase space –> optical magnetic fields!) von Bruce-Giblin Catastrophes (Black Hole) überschreiten, zwischen String- und Teilchengrenze (Divison durch Null undefiniert?) oder wenn Raum-Zeit-Quasi-Singularitäten ((cosmological) space-time-transforms (Danke, Mark Aaron Simpson, String Theory Development Group, FaTe Educational Page) mit Quasi-Singularitäten in Teilchen zusammenfallen.

Maldacena duality theory

Grenze zwischen durch String und Teilchen ausgelösten Gravitation

Antimaterie
Für Technologien zur Materie-Energieumwandlung welche mit Antimaterie arbeiten ist es noch ein weiter Weg. Unser Verständnis von der Natur der Antimaterie ist noch sehr unvollständig. Antimaterie annihiliert nicht immer mit ihrem Anti-Partner wegen EM-Shielding und weil die Raumtopologie wie eine Trennfunktion wirkt.

Auf Quantenebene betrachtet sind Antimaterie-Teilchen nicht von Materie abgegrenzte Instanzen, sondern dasselbe Atom, welches seine Anti-Ladung trägt – Proton und Elektron sind durch die Wirkung der entgegengesetzten Ladung Materie und Antimaterie zueinander – daß sie nicht dasselbe sind, bedeutet in diesem Zusammenhang noch gar nichts – das Ladung-zu-Masse Verhältnis von Proton und Elektron sagt uns das (Danke Michael Balmer).

Radioaktivität
Es ist allgemein weniger bekannt, daß Kohle- und Gas-Förderung eine beachtliche Menge an Radioaktivität verursacht, und zwar unter normalen Betriebsbedingungen noch mehr als durch Atomkraftwerke! Es existieren Landschaften in Russland oder den ehemaligen Gebieten der Sowjetunion, so großflächig wie in etwa Deutschland, welche durch Beta-Zerfall aus dem Kohlebergbau oder der Gasförderung radioaktiv dermaßen verseucht sind, daß beispielsweise Neugeborene mit Lungenproblemen auf die Welt kommen, oder  grauer, Schnee-artiger Regen fällt.

Forschung in Kernfusion
Deutschland hat es verpasst, Investitionen in Technologien zu tätigen, die bereits von z. B. Nikola Tesla erforscht wurden, und die Kernfusion entsprechend zu fördern. Die Förderung des Kernfusionsforschungsprojektes in Cadarache (Frankreich) ITER ist begrüssenswert, jedoch sollte das Konzept angepasst werden: weg vom Tokamak Konzept, hin zu z.B. Laser Pulsed Fusion (Dense Plasma Focus, eventuell Stellerator (Wendelstein 7-x)). Ein „Sun-on-Earth“-Ansatz sollte jedoch berücksichtigen, dass ein Stern den Fusionsprozeß in einem QED-SuperString-Vakuum vollzieht. Somit stellen nicht nur der geringere Druck und das niedrigere Plasmavolumen  innerhalb der Fusionsanlage  im Vergleich zum Stern ein Problem, sondern auch die physikalische Umgebung sowie physikalische Besonderheiten von Sternen. Weitere Forschung ist notwending im Bereich Hadronen/Partons und QCD.  Annahmen über Quark-Gluon Interaktionen und die Strong Force bzw. Nuclear Force müssen überarbeitet werden. Ein „Out-of-the-Box“ Denken ist angebracht.

Der Teilausstieg aus ITER-Folgeprojekten (Spin-Off-Projekte) erscheint zum jetzigen Zeipunkt sinnvoll. Zuerst müssen die grundsätzlichen Probleme in der theoretischen Physik gelöst werden.

Forschung und Bildung in Deutschland
Das deutsche Bundesministerium für Forschung und Wissenschaft lässt Initiativen vermissen, die verhindern, dass Deutschland von der Elite der Energienationen abgehängt wird. Aber sie streiten mit den Chinesen über Fragen zur Solarenergie. Deutschland hatte die falsche Strategie zur Solarstromförderung: man förderte Hausbesitzer anstatt die Solarstrom-Industrie.

Möglicherweise ist es das Beste bis andere Energiequellen zur Verfügung stehen, Sonnenenergie dort zu ernten, wo sie durch natürliche Bedingungen kontinuierlicher einfangbar ist, z.B. in Afrika, einer Wüste oder im Weltraum. Das Transportproblem sollte lösbar sein.

Autor dieses Blog-Post: Oliver Thewalt, Saarbrücken

Weiterführende Beiträge:

Version in Englischer Sprache

The scientifically proven link between solar activities and earthquakes

Oscillating Neutrinos: The Koide formula explained by flavour mixing in a Weyl 2-spinor, Schroedinger ‘Zitterbewegung’ lepton

Einführung zu Science Network Hixgrid in deutscher Sprache




geschrieben von Sternau \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dez 10

Das Standard Model dient dem Zweck der Aufrechterhaltung der Vorherrschaft der materialistischen Physik und der daraus abgeleiteten Technologie, die nur suboptimal ist um der entsprechenden Industrie Vorteile zu verschaffen und ein überlegenes Militär zu schaffen. Dazu wird für Alle wertvolles Wissen unterdrückt, um die Vorherrschaft in allen Märkten zu behalten, allen voran der Energiemarkt. Die Laureate Vergabe in Stockholm hat nichts mehr mit dem Testament von Alfred Nobel zu tun, sondern dient einzig und allein diesen Interessen.

In the Spirit of Ettore Majorana.


geschrieben von Sternau \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan 10

A documentary about Stonehenge reported about a theory of moon and sun cycles: the age of the sun replacing the (golden?) age of the moon

– moon: animal hunting in the moon light during old stone age, no property, a non-settled society  (hunter and gatherer), no battle for wealth, wealth not neccessary, healthy people, men and women in their social roles – no special gender related conflict as a long as everybody fits into its natural role.

– and sun: after an ice age many animals were gone so that h. sapiens was forced to do agcriculture -> settled people, monotonous work, over emphasis of the role of man, thinking in terms of farmland and beginning of acquis thinking, battles to gain wealth, disease due to settlement, domestication, domesticated animals -> no more living in accordance to a natural biorhythm (circadian complex) and nature’s rhythm

….hence scientists developed a theory about Stonehenge and Newgrange (Ireland) being designed to demonstrate the moon  ruling  over the sun in order to regain the ancient times and may be as a prophecy or warning (The massacre mass grave of Schöneck-Kilianstädten reveals new insights into collective violence in Early Neolithic Central Europe) – priests of the old stone age (or young stone age then) could have anticipated this destiny of mankind.

Our moon has different cycles: one month or about 18 years, which are an integral part of the  Stonehenge or Newgrange „astronomy“. This is amazing, isn’t it?

 

According to this world view, the „age of the  sun“ brought crop failures and diseases by for instance cross species transmutations of microorganisms due to domestication of animals and animal farming .

Archaeologists found 4 ‚Acqueducts‘ made of metal or gold in central Europe, which were revealed as crypted calendars!

I have the impression that the priests of stone age did know about this process to abandon the way of living as Hunters and Gatherers and that this was irreversible – this is brilliant, isn’t it?

geschrieben von Sternau \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Okt 06

We will never be able to descirbe the universe in a satisfactory way by mathematics. If this would be possible, human beings wouldn’t exist.

Quote „Physicist and author Michio Kaku has remarked that M-theory may present us with a „Theory of Everything“ which is so concise that its underlying formula would fit on a t-shirt.“

Hixgrid predicts that Kaku is right concerning the t-shirt effect, but he will never succeed in a unification of all theories by M-Theory.

Probably neither by any other theory! This is not possible by definition of all physics theories which have a defined mathematical set and sub-set.

Nature is definitely not working in that way! Nature is holistic, conscious and holographic – a cell is the same thing in terms of the underlying embedded very complex mechanisms as the whole universe.

The Pernicious Influence of Mathematics on Science

A Return To The Invisible College In Science 4a

 

 

To Apply Mathematics is as if you Apply Art -> it is worthless – nature is not applicable by mathematics – mathematics is beauty! If you apply mathematics you start to destroy our world and you make out of nature an instrument. The danger is that people will believe you…

geschrieben von Sternau \\ tags: , , , ,

blogoscoop