Jun 15

Das Atomkraftwerk (NPP, Nuclear Power Plant) Fukushima Daiichi (Fukushima I) konnte nach offiziellen Angaben wegen den Auswirkungen des Tsunami nach dem Tōhoku-Erdbeben am 11. März 2011 um 14:46:23 Uhr Ortszeit (M9 Earthquake, Prof. Kosuke Heki, Japan M9, atmospheric quake, LAIC) weder heruntergekühlt noch heruntergefahren werden.

Die tatsächliche Ursache für die Unmöglichkeit des Herunterkühlens bzw. Herunterfahrens der Nuklearanlage von Fukushima-Daiichi zur Verhinderung der drohenden Kernschmelze (Super-GAU) ist jedoch nicht in den Auswirkungen des Tsunami zu finden, sondern in einem Prozess welcher durch Sonnenaktivitäten VOR dem Erdbeben ausgelöst wurde, dem LAI-Coupling Prozess (Litosphären-Atmosphären-Ionosphären Kopplung, LAIC-Process).

LAI coupling Kamogawa 2004

LAI coupling Kamogawa 2004

Übersetzung aus dem Englischen eines Zitats von Torsten P. Kersten:

„Zu viele Menschen sind gestorben, da sie diese Lektion ignoriert haben: der physikalische Hintergrund für die Magnetfeld-Störung, ausgelöst durch den LAIC-Prozess (Lithosphären-Atmosphären Ionosphären Kopplung) und der nuklear-magnetischen Resonanz in magnetischen Feldern sowie den Auswirkungen auf die Energie und Spin der Elementarteilchen.

Mit sich ändernden Orbitalbahnen der Elektronen um den Atomkern wird der Zerfallsprozess in einem Atomkraftwerk unter diesen Bedingungen zu erhöhter Strahlung führen…. (Temperatur, Druck, Tscherenkow Strahlung (Pawel Alexejewitsch Cherenkov)…).

Weiterhin zeigt das Interview mit dem japanischen Experten, dass das atmosphärische Phänomen (zeitlich) VOR dem Erdbeben aufgezeichnet wurde. Diese Tatsache ist das stärkste Argument, von dem die HAARP-Verschwörungsanhänger sprechen.

Dennoch wurden diese Ereignisse klar erkennbar durch Sonnenaktivitäten ausgelöst! Dieses aufgezeichnete atmosphärische Phänomen wurde als co-seismisches Ereignis bezeichnet.

Jedoch zeigt die Aussage des japanischen Experten sehr deutlich, dass es VOR (in front of) dem Erdbeben stattfand, und dass diese Aussage mit der USGS Experten-Aussagen über die LAI-Kopplung übereinstimmt.

Induction Magnetometer Gakona, 10 march 2011 (UTC), Power Spectral Density

Induction Magnetometer Gakona, 10 march 2011 (UTC), Power Spectral Density

Die logische Konsequenz ergibt sich aus den Eigenschaften von geladenen Teilchen und deren Auswirkungen auf die

a.) globalen elektromagnetischen Feldvariationen (bis zu elektromagnetischen Stürmen, auch geomagnetische Stürme)

b.) das lokale Magnetfeld, welches sich aufbauen, und sogar von einem Wirbel bestehend aus einem von der Ionosphäre herunterströmenden Teilchenstrom, „geflasht“ werden kann. Wie ein unsichtbarer Blitzschlag, aber es handelt sich immer noch um pure Ladung.

Die LAI-Kopplung beschreibt, wie solare, hochgeladene Teilchenstürme (Large Proton Event oder Solar Particle Event durch z.B. Coronal Mass Ejections – Anmerkung: Wenn Protonen auf die äussere Hülle der Erdatmosphäre treffen, dann annihilieren sie mit Photonen, sodass man entgegen den Aussagen dieses Artikels in Wirklichkeit Positronen misst und nicht Protonen) – einen elektrostatischen Upload in der Lithosphäre auslösen, welcher sich aus zeitlicher Sicht VOR dem Erdbeben aufbaut.

Dies kann mit modernen Instrumenten beobachtet werden und wird in der Wissenschaft beschrieben. Dies ist Teil der bekannten Wissenschaft und Forschung in akademischen Kreisen, sodass Ihre Regierung schon Wochen vorher weiss, wann und wo sich ein signifikantes Erdbeben ereignen kann.

LAI Coupling: a process of charge exchange between lithosphere, atmosphere and ionosphere as described by hundreds of scientific studies and already part of USGS and NOAA’s 2008 training seminars for seismic experts on remote sensing via satellites.

Most prominent example: the tracked ‚atmospheric quake‘ in front of the Japan M 9, published by Prof. Kosuke Heki, of Hokkaido University in Sapporo, Japan:

Quote: „A tantalizing question for seismologists and atmospheric scientists is whether this high-altitude electron bump, if confirmed by other studies, is a true early-warning signal for devastating earthquakes. Geophysicist Kosuke Heki of Hokkaido University in Sapporo, Japan, who reports the suggestive buildups in a new scientific paper, thinks that it could be.

“The claim that earthquakes are inherently unpredictable might not be true, at least for M9 [magnitude 9] class earthquakes,” Heki writes in an article accepted for publication in Geophysical Research Letters, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.

The study suggests that the total electron content, or TEC, in the ionosphere starts increasing as much as eight percent above background levels prior to massive earthquakes, with the biggest effect above the rupturing fault.

The electron buildup before the Japan earthquake started 40 minutes before disaster struck.

The time involved in retrieving and analyzing the TEC data would make it difficult to use the information as a potential earthquake warning, the researcher says. For some scientists, even the notion of an earthquake precursor is controversial. Another earthquake expert, not involved in the study, said the data is interesting and should be studied in the future, but he is not completely convinced that change in TEC is an earthquake precursor.

Days after the devastating magnitude 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake struck Japan, Heki downloaded data from satellites that are part of the GPS Earth Observation Network. He was interested in oscillations of the TEC when acoustic waves echo from the epicenter into the ionosphere.

“I thought I’d see a very strong signal after this earthquake,” Heki says. “And in the course of working on that, I found something strange happened.” The Total Electron Content (Total Electron Content) was higher before the expected oscillations occurred than it was after the oscillations, so he took another look at the raw data from the GPS satellites. “ Unquote

Ionospheric electron enhancement preceding
the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake
, Geophysical Research Letters

LAI Coupling = Litosphere – Atmosphere – Ionosphere Coupling (Litosphären-Atmosphären-Ionosphären Kopplung, LAIC-Prozess).

Die erhöhte Strahlung erzeugt folglich mehr thermische Energie. Wenn nun die Kühlsysteme unter einem Überdruck arbeiten, dann funktioniert weder die Abschaltung noch das Herunterkühlen des Reaktors.

Pictures and Data Proof for Fukushima LAI Coupling (Litosphere - Atmosphere - Ionosphere Coupling)

Pictures and Data Proof for Fukushima LAI Coupling (Litosphere – Atmosphere – Ionosphere Coupling)

Die Anlage war nicht mehr kühlbar. Kurze Zeit nach dem Erdbeben ging die Strahlung außerhalb der Anlage in Richtung Mond, wie die HAARP Daten zeigen. Der Tsunami traf die Anlage jedoch erst eine 3/4 Stunde nach dem Erdbeben!

Die Aussage, der Tsunami hätte das Herunterkühlen der Anlage verhindert, war eine Lüge!

Research in Monitoring Earthquakes by Dr. Ouzounov 2007

Research in Monitoring Earthquakes by Dr. Ouzounov 2007

Kommentar in englischer Sprache von Torsten P. Kersten (ca.2012):

Quote:
„the word ‚coupling‘ decribes in technical language the transmission of power via an axis. every motor knows this concept and your car would only drive in one ‚gear‘ if mankind wouldn’t understand ‚coupling‘.

so we are talking of a transmission from Ionosphere, where the cme’s and hard radiation hit on the geomagnetic shielding, a buffer zone, called atmosphere ( like the oil in your gearhousing ) and a second ‚black-box system‘ with it’s entry at the litho (stone) sphere.

The concept of how ‚energy‘ or Solar PULSE is transmitted and exchanged between different media …

two solar proton events in that perieod btw, so we can assume that we had a quite active sun … two Proton events within a month, this is large sunspot action ….

data:
Feb 17/2020 Feb 17/2205 31 Feb 16/0200 X2/2B N15E48 1574
Apr 03/1600 Apr 03/2310 45

solar proton event 1 happened on Feb 17th 1979 at 20:20 h, maximum level was at 22:05, the corelated cme was on Feb 16th at 02:00 UTC and it was an X 2 event from the region N 15 E 48. The proton flux particle count was 31 pfu @ > 10MeV. The sunspot number was 1574

event 2 only comes with the date, beginning Apr 3rd at 16:00 with a maximum at 23:10, 45 pfu@>10MeV
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/ftpdir/indices/SPE.txt

So, here you can see, that the solar activity background level was already ‚hazardous‘ in terms of what we know about the solar tectonic coupling.

To impact on earth and affect the radiation and thus the heat and pressure development in a nuclear power plant a solar flare must have emitted on 25th to be ahead of the event at the nuclear power plant heat/pressure rise.

This is the report on the the 1979 march 25th solar flare:
High-resolution X-ray spectra of the 1979 March 25 solar flare
Here is the abstract:

according to this article the march 25th flare was an X 1 event, which started at shortly before 18:00 at about W 10 N 77.

If I argue with the solar impact on the nuclear catastrophes, there must have been solar action, right? Here is the evidence for this case.

Fukushima:
the solar background for Fukushima is interesting to observe. I did that online and – live -. I saw the solar proton event, triggered by an M 3 event and warned for a big one comming.

I listed the potential candidates Asia Japan was on top of the list with few other locations. I still can not understand how NASA and USGS did not warn.

You can look at it if you

a.) look up the solar proton event list, posted above,

…and

b.) when you observe the cme activity for the period on LASCO C 3. My tip: look at it in 512 resolution first and see a larger chunk of the TIME line. start feb 18th …

The X-ray chart showed an X event, I saved a copy ….

we cannot control nuclear reactors with sudden magnetic disturbances impacting on them. Too many people are dead for ignoring this lesson.

the pysical background for the magnetic field disturbance, released by LAIC process (Lithosphere Atmosphere Ionosphere Coupling) and the article on nuclear resonance in magnetic fields and the impact on the subatomic particle speed and spin. With altering orbits around the atom, the decay process in a nuclear powerplant will result under this conditions in increased radiation …. (heat, pressure…)

as well as the interview with the japanese expert who states that the atmospheric phenomenon was tracked ahead of the earthquake. This fact is the strongest argument the HAARP conspiracy believers are talking about. Nevertheless, the impact was clearly a solar caused event. The tracked atmospheric phenomenon is called a co-seismic event. But the statement from the japanese expert clearly says it was in front of the earthquake and this statement matches with USGS expert statements on the LAI Coupling. The logical implication is the properties of the charged particles and their impact on the a.) global electromagnetic field variations (down to electromagnetic storm) and b.) they local magnetic field which can build up and be ‚flashed‘ by a vortex of downstreaming particles. Like an invisible lightning, but still charge.

The LAI Coupling describes how solar, highly charged particle storms release static upload in the lithosphere, which builds up in front of earthquakes. This process is observable with contemporary instruments and science. The process is regular science, published, part of the acedemic research and your government komws weeks ahead that a significant earthquake builds up and where.

Surprise comes with deep rising magma and it’s charge and impact on the magnetic and static energy field conditions along certain tectonic active areas. Chernobyl for instance was build exaclty on top of an randomly active fault line. (often the rivers have their beds there and water is needed for the cooling of the plant). There is already credible evidence, that Chernobyl was affected with it’s accident by similar pysical laws.

‎“The satellite technology (remote sensing, ionospheric plasma measurements, GPS TEC) provided opportunity to clarify the physics of the processes chain, occurring during the earthquake process and which we name Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere (LAI) coupling. The LAI model created recently, permitted to unite different groups of scientists working in different areas by the common physical mechanism which is able to explain geochemical, atmospheric, geoelectric, thermal and ionospheric anomalies observed within the time interval few weeks before the seismic shock within the area called earthquake preparation area. The LAI model permitted to change the approach of the modern earthquake science to the so called physical precursors of earthquakes. The LAI coupling could explain why some time ago some EM phenomena were considered as not a precursors and possibility for their use in short term earthquake prediction was doubt in great extend by the whole community. Recent major earthquakes rendered to us the dataset completely supporting our model. The only element which is still questioned is the triggering mechanism which will also be discussed in the present paper. “

Unquote

Der Ausstieg Deutschlands aus der Atomenergie hängt mit diesen Erkenntnissen zusammen.

Die NASA zensiert Erdbebendaten um diese Vorgänge zu verschleiern.

Quote: Torsten P. Kersten: this chart is the centerpiece of, what they admit.

LAIC Process

Litosphere – Atmosphere – Ionosphere Coupling

 

I will put in a note that a.) explains the role the geomagnetic shielding and sun have in this game and I will show you why the northern pole hurries off it’s former equinox.
I will show you some more evidence: from the nuclear testing to the early subsea tectonics starting with the tests up to Mr. Obama attending the start for last journey of Endeavor and it’s incredible costly instrument, a mass spectrometer calibrated in CERN and why this was more important than the wedding of a young british prince, who is befriended with the Obama family. They had their ticket for the party.

I will show you how and in which big size our public perception is manipulated and why the western idustrial societies systems we believed to be ok are unjust and killing. And I show you the long term aproach of the US to this Crime. Starting in the second World War.

In the upper picture you can see in the top right corner a picture from Sun and a coronal mass ejection. You can see a cloud wich is named ‚electron density change‘. You can see a flash below the lithosphere (the stone sphere) the words ‚discharge‘ and ‚Electrokinetic Microfracture‘.

There you are … a system with charge and flash. Particle Physics. Easy to understand if I tell you the story without frills.

And you should take 2.5 hours TIME and listen to the story NASA tells to a top gremia

Before seeing this prensentation, you need to install microsoft silverlight, witch is done automaticly. the presentation focuses on all the anomolies in our solar system and the impacts on earth.
the presentation comes from Delft University of Technologi in Holland

http://collegerama.tudelft.nl/mediasite/SilverlightPlayer/Default.aspx?peid=c29550a872814c2a9e7ba28ac0c7d1e61d

Thanks to Pamela Carr and her solar and celestial bodies watch dog group.“
Unquote

Autor dieses Blog-Post: Oliver Thewalt, Saarbrücken


Weiterführende Links:
Contemporary Science: LAI Coupling, earthquake precursors and prewarning possibilities

Earthquake Precursors and Evidence of Suns impact & triggering

Weiterführende Links:

1 .Gesamtelektroneninhalt, TEC https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_electron_content

2. Total Electron Content USA USA

3. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

4. Magnetic Reconnection

5. Onset of Fast Magnetic Reconnection

6. Ionospheric and Atmospheric Remote Sensing http://iono.jpl.nasa.gov/

7. CME Earthquake Torsten P Kersten:

Zitat:“

„Earthpointed CME always means energy douche, even on energy channels you haven’t heard of. Invisible, but able to trigger earthquakes, so the official public statement of an USGS expert on LAI Coupling“

8. Explanation of Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling System Anomalous Geophysical Phenomena on the Basis of the Model of Generation of Electromagnetic Emission Detected Before Earthquake

9. Pictures and Data Proof for Fukushima – LAI-coupling post.

geschrieben von Sternau \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Hinterlasse ein Kommentar

blogoscoop