Sep 18

This post serves as a „proof“ because some people, like staff of the Ministry of Economics in the Saarland (Germany, Saarbrücken), not all of them, but some, pretend that my assertions in physics would not be „proven“, some are still not officially  accepted, but this is  just a matter of time, I remember most scientists I am in contact with, being aware of this, comments like „brilliant“ and some more, even „stronger“,  have been communicated on a daily basis, but especially in the western countries, there is a tendency of trying to ignore those things, in order to protect their fundings only, while trying to blend out the life and the work of their own children, pupils, students, citizens, employers or employees, pensioners or whoever, this is why I am compiling this Blog post.

The reason is not about self-praisal. In Germany, this is sill necessary in order to overcome a national silence, hidden or feigned  „amnesia“ and ignorance. We who are doing the most decisive work have deserved the respect, honor and payment for our work and  commitment, we all, in the universities, at the companies, in school, at home, in the country, outside our countries, wherever we are, with whom ever we are in contact with, doing the „right“ thing, developing awesome theories and technology, enabling other people, other students or scientists, other employees, other children or pensioners, foreign poeple who are visting our countries, refugees, or officials, police men really doing their job, politicians really doing their job, journalists and media really doing their job, teachers really doing their job, scientists really doing their job, and before all, parents really doing their „job“, loving their children and not just kissing the political party or the church or the company or whoever, whoever is really doing his/her job!

I am observing this every day, especially people from other non-western, cultures, for instance indian, brazilian or east european cultures like Poland or Russia, remember, the Polish code crackers have been the biggest help for Alan Turing’s work, not anybody else, I am talking occasionally to those wonderful polish people here in Germany and it breaks my heart how badly they are treated by  our Government, the same for young or old people from, for instance, Rumania, I can tell you stories that really have happened, and you would not believe it … is heart breaking, but my hands are like fettered by my own Government, how greatly they treat their children, how proud they look, and how badly Germany is treating its own children, how humiliated and agressive they look, and these are the very reasons!

BTW, you western bad science „teachers“ to hell with TYPOS, because: A Genius is not about IQ, intelligence is not about the brain, the brain is not about thinking. Read the story in german language about Évariste Galois at the end of this article, it is about the bad conditions of the education system in his life time, and this is still at the core of the western education system and there is no doubt about this, and the ignorance on a political level.

I remember Michael Balmer asking me Who I am „….Who you are“, writing things like „Brilliant“ as a Comment in in our secret group after posting my newest theory about theoretical physics, and deleting his own comment shortly afterwards. I can’t help it, this is not about the mind control by NASA/JPL and the Ivy League, no?

Preliminary Information about the Matter Creation Process in the Higgs-Field



So where are the data from NASA and ESA and the correct interpretation? Who started to debunk Einstein’s myth about STR/GTR (not his photo electric effect!), Michael Balmer said it correctly, for the Dark Matter field and The verification of light not bending is Shadows and for Time until Matter,

… I am always giving people their correct credits, but why are they still refering to Einstein regarding theories about Black Holes or Nuclear Fission? Didn’t people recognize that Wheeler, Einstein, and even Stephen Hawking are hiding the correct interpretation in order to protect their energy models and control of other cultures by for instance the nuclear industry? What about micro Black Hole Cavity States and photon – photon Micro BH coupling?

May be you start here? 

Theoretical Physics for new energy – IT – Energy Cluster

Science is about understanding, not about „knowledge“, and it starts with parenting and at the Kindergarden, at school and at university and the companies, and it is related to our governments and parliaments and laws and the energy and IT  models and foreign policy, and it is about a false flag system and nothing else!

This post should demonstrate that a talent has debunked this Model about Time Crystals by some Nobel Laureates and scientists of the Ivy League, for instance MIT, Harvard or CalTech in his mind within NANOSECONDS, the real „problem“ for this mind was about putting this into an appropriate wording, so that other „scientists“ of the Ivy League are able to grasp it, for students of india and the BRICS states, this is less a „problem“, and remember, I love the Alma Mater of people, I really love CalTech and Harvard and Princeton and the Technion, the IAS and NASA and would love nothing more than to work for them and get paid by them .. recently I said in a conversation: „….and now to NASA AMES research Center, those „idiots“, this should be an honor  to you!

It is not that I do not like those people there, I was in California several times and this was always my dream, Silicon Valley and Stanford, I wanted to study computer science at Stanford and add the Natural Sciences later, being a banker was about enabling research, freeing our minds in order to enable research and technology transfer, but the core are all people, and „For all mankind“ should not be just an odd NASA slogan!



It is about what we are really doing and saying, not what we pretend to do and say and think!

We do not need our minds being controlled but being liberated, not liberated from people, children are innocent and people cannot be bad, but an artificial belief can trigger artificially made so called „bad“ people, that are  not „bad“, but the belief is insane, this is why we are ought to attack this belief, because Alan Turing was the „true“ patriot, we are the patriots, my best friend Georg Drakenberg and his family are the patriots, we all are patriots, all over the world, WE ARE MANKIND, we are KIND and HUMBLE and we do not humiliate people or our children or torture them, we do not torture animals, hunting animals and killing them fast without uneccessary pain is a natural and awesome gift, we are gifted! Breeding them in the slaughterhouse is really painful for those animals!

Our children deserve awesome parents fighting for their rights! Our students deserve awesome  teachers and Professorship fighting for their work! Our citizens deserve awesome politicians doing their jobs! Our media deserve awesome journalists doing their job and fighting for the truth! Our countries deserve awesome scientists doing their job, fighting for facts! Our environments deserve awesome researchers studying nature and fighting for us and our environments!  Our children and the next generation deserve awesome engineers fighting for the best and safest and cleanest technology! People deserve awesome researchers and employers in order to keep them healthy!

Did you know that one of the first Twitter Accounts with a high impact on global scale following me was from Israel? The Technion, the energy incubator of the Technion, the GTEP, Israel Space, the ASRI and some more Technion related accounts are still following me on Twitter ( –, Stanford Energy was just trying to catch me as follower, some do no more follow because I had to block them temporarily, like Andreas Warburton of CERN,  but the reason of my blocking was not about Andreas, it was about what my Government has done here in Germany, and my Government, my Alma Mater, the European Business School, Schloß Reicharthausen Prof Ulrich Grimm and Prof Klaus Evard, Professor Georg H. Küster and Prof Manfred Bruhn, Prof Roswita (added later on:Mayer) I do  not remember her last name right now, I am not sorry, but her lectures  have just been boring and odd, and Prof Schulte have not done their job!

This is why my parents have to blame the CDU and their Government because the educational system is fully broken and not me! They have simply not done their job and I have given sufficient explanations about the reason why! I am not willing to get tamed like John Forbes Nash, he was humiliated by this own wife!  A spouse has to do her „job“ as well! For her husband and her children! Got it, Irvana Trump? (!) 😉

Protect your own family, not against your children, your husband or spouse, or a talent and scientist and whitstleblower, but against false flag mediators, so that all those children will not suffer in Syria and become poor and homeless in your own bloody country! Isn’t this what Martin Luther-King  was saying? I have a dream? Why dreaming? Doing it! Yes, we can, and we are not doing just nothing! Doing nothing and remaining silent is even worse than doing the „false“ thing.

What we do not want are false flags, and I love people in Israel and Iran! I have many friends there! And there are more and more fans! And I love Princess Leia in Star Wars, she has sent a message via R2D2 to her true friends, fighting for the Republic, like Évariste Galois, we are the working class, we are patriots and we really love you all! Good night and good luck!


1 to 5 Nanoseconds ……:

for debunking this post about Time Crystals:

lol, this is utter nonsense, look up Noether current and Coulomb’s law, have a look at the Antimatter (tachyonic charge identity) .. there are no symmetries and asymmetries, those people need them in order to develop a technology by gauge theory, but gauge theory is flawed …
quasi FTL communication via for instance neutrinos is not about time but about preexistent states, guys!!!

Zero in physics

lol, this is utter nonsense, look up Noether current and Coulomb's law, have a look at the Antimatter (tachyonic charge…

Gepostet von Oliver Thewalt am Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2016


Physicists Create World’s First Time Crystal

Time crystals were first predicted in 2012. Now researchers have created time crystals for the first time and say they could one day be used as quantum memories.



Oliver Thewalt i will give more evidence soon!
5. Oktober 2016 um 09:53
Jonathan Vos Post
Jonathan Vos Post .
Please recall, 4 years ago, my finding a flaw in the first two „Time Crystals“ papers, having Physics Nobel Laureate Brian David Josephson agree with me, and pass my correct critique to the particle physicist who so erred in public. I detailed that on Facebook.
1 · 5. Oktober 2016 um 15:25
Oliver Thewalt
Oliver Thewalt Thanks, Jonathan, can you give me the concrete FB resource (link) for your critique?

Yes, but this has not taken into account the charge identity …… I had conversation with Prof Márcio Roberto de G Maia about this. I have to edit this before I can publish it.

Pawyigh Lee Montgomery How should the current charge be identified? By spin?
6. Oktober 2016 um 06:44

Pawyigh Lee Montgomery In reply to a Physics World shared link on „Demistifying Spin 1/2“, I suggested that, while walking on the right side of a path, a half spin will put you on the left.
6. Oktober 2016 um 06:53

Pawyigh Lee Montgomery Explains in a nutshell the current political climate in the U.S. and U.K.

Jonathan Vos Post .
Brian Josephson agrees with me, about the error I found on hearing
about Wilczec’s discovery, in the New Scientist that I read at Gladston
airport, Queensland, Australia, emailed me and Jack Sarfatti and
others to say so, and elucidates why, on the errors in the 2 „Time
Crystal“ papers by his fellow Nobel Laureate Frank Wilczek.

I suggested that the protocl is for Brian to explain the corrections
to Frank Wilczek
Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 USA

Classical Time Crystals
Alfred Shapere, Frank Wilczek
(Submitted on 12 Feb 2012)

We consider the possibility that classical dynamical systems
display motion in their lowest energy state, forming a time analogue
of crystalline spatial order. Challenges facing that idea are
identified and overcome. We display arbitrary orbits of an angular
variable as lowest-energy trajectories for nonsingular Lagrangian
systems. Dynamics within orbits of broken symmetry provide a natural
arena for formation of time crystals. We exhibit models of that kind,
including a model with traveling density waves.

Comments: 5 pages, 1 figure
Subjects: Other Condensed Matter (cond-mat.other); General Relativity
and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); High Energy Physics – Theory (hep-th);
Mathematical Physics (math-ph); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1202.2537v1 [cond-mat.other]
Submission history
From: Frank Wilczek [view email]
[v1] Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:48:47 GMT (33kb,D)

Quantum Time Crystals
Frank Wilczek
(Submitted on 12 Feb 2012)

Difficulties around the idea of spontaneous breaking of time
translation symmetry in a closed quantum mechanical system are
identified, and then overcome in a simple model. The possibility of
ordering in imaginary time is also discussed.

Comments: 6 pages, no figures
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Other Condensed Matter
(cond-mat.other); Superconductivity (cond-mat.supr-con)
Cite as: arXiv:1202.2539v1 [quant-ph]
Submission history
From: Frank Wilczek [view email]
[v1] Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:57:10 GMT (21kb)
1 · 6. Oktober 2016 um 08:51

Jonathan Vos Post .
I first saw this described in a New Scientist at the news stand of Brisbane airport, Queensland, Australia.

What was wrong with the example as given in NS, claiming literally infinite lifetime for memory stored this way, was that it used loops of superconducting wire. Careful reading of the modern Mathematical Physics literature on superconductivity shows that it has finite lifetime.
1 · 6. Oktober 2016 um 08:52



Electric charge – is this what we thought?

Noether current: Noether current and Coulomb’s law, have a look at the Antimatter (#tachyonic #charge #identity) .. there are no symmetries or asymmetries as such in nature

About Noether current:

Quote: (Prof Márcio Roberto de Garcia Maia, Federal University of Southern Bahia

„It is not a technical (in the sense of engineering) concern, but rather the fact that it seems to me that, as it happens to mass, there is some circularity in its definition. So, when I say ‚operational point of view‘, I mean ‚ how is it supposed to be measured and what assumptions are made in such a definition/measurement. For instance, what comes first: Coulomb law or the charge definition? Or is there some circularity between these two aspects? This concern is related to some calculations I have made related to a ‚missing term‘ in Ampere-Maxwell law. The existence of this missing term is acknowledged by Hehl (Univ of Colony) and Obukhov in a series of papers (see ‚premetric electrodynamics‘). This leads to a certain ambiguity on the definition of the electromagnetic field, but they argue that one can get rid of this ambiguity performing certain experiments. And this is the point: it seems to me that the circularity ramains because the interpretation of such experiments depends on the definition of charge itself, and/or the Coulomb law.“


I agree on your overall impression that there is something missing or to say in this way, that the interpretation or even some „ceteris paribus“ conditions are wrong:

Examining Faraday’s Law, it seems not just to be a question about mass as a conductor or induced magnetic fields by a charge or about an electro static potential“ which was theorized, in Faraday’s induction law: a current due to changes in the EM-Field, here magnetic flux ….

Physicists should not separate EM fields as such by magnetic flux and currents in general, or mass from the quantum vacuum – concerning a quantum measurement for a quantum energy state in view to mass or matter or energy in view to mass or stability constraints for matter.

By applying quantum physics we can show that the definition of an electric charge by Noether’s charge is flawed due to the assumption of (gauge) symmetries and the interpretation of an absolute law of conservation of energy, which I do not deny, but the INTERPRETATION depends on the „plane“ of the observation or measurment: what should be conserved within what?

What is energy at all, and what mass? And here appears the antimatter identity (About the Antimatter identity – and charge identity) …

This is because mass and energy are concepts by human beings or Einstein mainly for the so called real world in Einstein’s world view of a constant speed of light in the quantum vacuum and E=MC^2, but this fails for Faster than Light phenomena such as Dark Matter, Black Holes or Gravity.

In general, it can be assumed that any deviation to the assumptions of the Standard Model would need a very precise measurement or very high energy fluxes, we may try to apply this for the Planck Scale from the very small to the very large, but more effectively, because we are dealing here with quantum thresholds in photonic mediation: inducing and observing changes in energy potentials or extreme energy scaling and oscillations, spin – spin, spin orbit or angular momentum coupling via Pauli’s Exclusion Principle

MIT Video Lecture by Prof Edmund Bertschinger about General Relativity and Astrophysics – Excerpt

…. the photonic mediation is within spin, charge identity and oscillation of the quantum energy states for the virtuals: a moving charge induces a magnetic field – are we sure about cause and effect here? is the „cause“ that the charge is moving resulting in the induction of a magnetic field or flux?

Within a quantized plane, I assume, it should not be possible (or quantum measurement?!) to tell cause from effect – this we should discuss in further detail!

on quantum level, there is no cause and effect – there cannot be any initial moment within existence – existence needs non -existence, the unobservable universe – it is about a phase transition within fractal dimensions, dimensional transiting ghost virtuals at horizons….and a quantum non quantum threshold.

Inner infinity notion of existence in n-fractal dimensional transitions at horizons


Oliver Thewalt Hence I agree that “interpretation of such experiments depends on the definition of charge itself, and/or the Coulomb law.”

For a more complete approach we should take into account the antimatter identity and tachyonic Black Hole identity – also in view of unfolding electro-magnetic fields at Yang Mills AdS5 phase space by Black Hole to particle horizons.

More evidence is provided by the discovery of Kobolts or Sprites by NASA in the ionosphere (antimatter, or antimatter in gamma rays, thunderstorms (TGF)

or of hitherto unobserved “fields” in power transmission carriers by Zeptosecond Quantum cameras.

Symmetries in nature are just a concept of the human mind, there cannot be a current flux as such or any direction of a current as such, we should take into account the nuclear shell model and the quark gluon model in view to QCD …. More on that later

Be aware of this:

Comment by Michael Balmer on the Antimatter Thread as an excerpt:

Michael Balmer, 01. Jan 2015, 10:21 AM
“ matter,antimatter,dark matter,what about dark antimatter?what puts this all in conflict and turmoil is each persons subscribing to the term,in Susy it is the anti-„partner“ some say the opposite charge sign,some just think it is the evil twin out to get us,the opposite of the normal be it in observation of the negative or the positive it doesn’t matter,the equality of distribution in infinity is a localized field represented by EMFields and Matter fields,in some areas such as Plasma Field of positive ions it is balance to antimatter but antimatter is unstable unshielded at the quantum level and at the macro level though still unstable and radioactive it’s quantity is sufficient to maintain it’s ability not to annihilate at once giving it’s long half life this aided by the so called dark matter field separating the EMField at that point,the dark matter field acts as an insulator against the annihilation process,again,this is not at every point in space of this situation,when researching this on a quantum level the antimatter particles are not separate entities of matter but the same atom carrying it’s anti charge,a proton and electron are by virtue of the opposing charge matter and anti matter to each other and not being the same means nothing…the charge to mass ratio of the electron to the proton will show you this,it may be smaller but pound for pound as the saying goes puts it on an even field,now you can charge conjugate an atom and classify it as antimatter as well…nature does it all the time…this is where the positron appears“

MichaeI Balmer, Quote: ”I am still amazed by the LHC (CERN) and that there is still the mystery of more matter than…

Gepostet von Oliver Thewalt am Freitag, 26. April 2013

Mass is in Einstein’s world view responsible for gravity, but mass could not be measured without that there is „somewhere“ a (tachyonic) antimatter identity, the positron, which is not just an anti electron.

Michael Balmer, Quote:

„It has been asserted and accepted that within a nucleus happens a conjugation of protons and neutrons…having said that, when the neutron converts to a proton, is this the loss of mass as well?

…radiation is the particle emitting the charge energy so to speak, to photons and neutrino interaction first is to administer the charge through the weak force, it’s not really creating the proton but one aspect of it…the charge … it is about decay and instability of the nucleus …particles…and existence is based on three…negative ,positive and neutral, with hydrogen with a proton nucleus would be unstable and decay without the neutrality to stabilize it,this is where neutrinos are with Hydrogen,to replace the presence of a neutron.

How and why Quarks Conjugate

Note by Michael Balmer

Gepostet von Michael Balmer am Mittwoch, 17. August 2016

Gepostet von Michael Balmer am Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2015

..the swirl function describes the gluon influence…..

the gluon keeps the quarks bonded, so there must be a neutral influence to prevent annihilation.
the Z boson is the neutrality of the Wf (weak force)


is about color charge – and this   …

Nuclear force – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The nuclear force (or nucleon–nucleon interaction or residual strong force) is the force between protons and neutrons, subatomic particles that are collectively called nucleons. The nuclear force is responsible for binding protons and neutrons into atomic nuclei. Neutrons and protons are affected by…
as it is asserted here

isospin quantum number

Quote Michael Balmer:

„The nucleus of anti hydrogen is a negative proton
To make it a neative proton the up and down quarks must be reversed
It would be ionized to negative plasma, you can not shield a H1- …. the – e + e is the problem: as in QCD the anti H1 nucleus is unchanged: The swirl function with the neutron and gluons is a strong force phenomenon and only occurs in the nucleus, it is the workings of the gluons in holding the quarks together, it is a QCD not taught. You may find this hard to believe with our current physic because of heisenburg but spin photons is yes but we cannot attain them until intergalactic travel is reached. The spin of the photon is based on the propagation and the energy of the event, the energy may not be carried off entirely by the photon, that is a low energy photon
Which complete conversion of the energy velocity and spin may be higher. Helicity is the direction of spin and angular momentum. But mostly associated with the spin of the electron. Whether it spin left or spins right, in the Pauli it is how the two can occupy the same orbital path. The Higgs is strong force or nucleus event. The Higgs particle assigns mass to itself and other atoms.

The up and down quarks of the proton: One down and two up ,down is neg 1/3 and pos 2/3. The neutron has 2 1/3 and 1 1/3.One up positive and two down negative is a neutron.

It is a neg proton the reverse of the quarks makes it a neutron
A negative proton is the reverse of quarks, the reverse of quarks is a neutron.

The anti hydrogen has a neutron nucleus.
Which is why it will not annihilate.–-seen-from-higgs-string-vacua-foldings-bh-states-bh-identity-and-electron-nuclear-shell-model

Oliver Thewalt What is mass in view to energy – The Problem with the conservation of energy on a universal scale.

by Oliver Thewalt

The problem with conservation of energy on a universal scale turned out to be a tautology, it depends on the definition, but matter and energy, or in those (gauge) concepts, mass and energy are not well defined concepts, because it is decisive to understand, what is mass in view to energy, in a nutshell, regarding Pauli, it is about energy scaling, or „high energy physics“ (what happens to fermions when the energy increases tremendously?) Energy is more about the unobservable universe, the same for matter! I think that Aristoteles was never disproved (horror vacui), because „nothing“ or quantum vacuum is not that it was assumed, the photon or what is visible for us (light!) is just a „seggregation“ of space, it is just a narrow belief to observe something by its „visibility“ and draw conclusions (interpretation)! The visible aspects of life or nature (the „Universe“) are of no importance concerning any ultima ratio or conclusion/general interpretation.

Mass is the same as energy – mass is a unique imprint of an energy folding and bonding in a phase transition within space topology. ~ Oliver Thewalt

Nevertheless, Gauge theories are appropriate in order to develop a technology, but a technology does never exactly what it is supposed to do.


Mathematician to know: Emmy Noether…/mathematician-to-know…

Noether’s Theorem in a Nutshell

The Noether Theorem…/NewFiles/Noether_theorem.pdf

E. Noether’s Discovery of the Deep Connection Between Symmetries and Conservation Laws

The most beautiful idea in physics – Noether’s Theorem

Why don't people recognize that Einstein was dumb like a duck, he was just promoted, abused and protected for his…

Gepostet von Oliver Thewalt am Freitag, 10. März 2017



We Choose to go to the Moon

Yes, JFK was a partiot, we need patriots for all mankind!

Yes, Richard Feynman, these have been awesome lectures, we need a message for the natural sciences,  a Messenger lecture!

Further reading:

The Metaplane within the unobservable universe – Ramanujan and the matter creation process in the Higgs Field

geschrieben von Sternau \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sep 18

Bundestagswahl 2017

Das bedingungslose Grundeinkommen befreit die werktätige Bevölkerung von Lohnnebenkosten, senkt dadurch strukturelle und friktionelle Arbeitslosigkeit.

Die Lohnnebenkosten sind für Arbeitnehmer nur ein Hindernis, man muss früher ansetzen, über das bedingungslose Grundeinkommen. Das BGE soll unabhängig von anderen Einnahmequellen sein.

Man kann es senken ab einem bestimmten Einkommensniveau, aber nie unter einen Grenzwert, der zudem variabel sein sollte. Die Bestimmung des Grenzwertes kann über eine börsenartige Struktur erfolgen (Warenkörbe,  Kaufkraft, Mindestanforderungen für Lebensbedingungen (z.B. Internetzugang)). Die Aufsicht ist schrittweise von der Regierung loszulösen, in einem ersten Schritt anteilig. Die Motivation für eigenes Einkommen soll zu diesem Zweck nicht nur pekuniär sein, das Incentive System wird den Bedingungen angepasst (Siehe Motivation/Spin Off Kultur/Eigene Projekte).

Das bedingungslose Grundeinkommen dient nicht in erster Linie zur Absicherung der Bürger, sondern zur Rettung von Deutschland und Europa (Sicht aus VWL/Global View).

Das bedingungslose Grundeinkommen wird aus der Wirtschaftstheorie von einem Genie begründet, John Forbes Nash | Nash Equilibrium

Das bedingungslose Grundeinkommen wird einen starken Nettoanstieg des BSP erzeugen, indem der Importanteil am Export gesenkt wird, wobei über das Verhältnis der Bezugsgrößen untereinander und der Nutzeninterpretation der eigentliche „Nutzen“ entsteht.

Durch das Bedingungslose Grundeinkommen kann die Arbeitswelt erweitert werden: zunächst entstehen „sinnvollere“ Arbeitsplätze, statt reine Einkommensplätze, da die Leute eher ihren Vorlieben und Begabungen nachgehen können, um dies mit einem Anreiz verbinden, ihren Lebensunterhalt zu finanzieren. Die Art und Weise wie wir Ressourcen bewerten und nutzen, spielt dabei eine zentrale Rolle: der Mensch ist keine Ressource, ebenso wenig Öl, alle Ressourcen sind austauschbar! Die Potentiale von Menschen bestehen in deren Anpassungsfähigkeit auf ständigen Wandel, sie können diese Anforderungen sehr gut erfüllen, dies gilt es zu nutzen.

Das bedingungslose Grundeinkommen wird ein Nettoplus erzeugen, nicht nur im Sinne der Handelsbilanz oder Steueraufkommen.

Das Bedingungslose Grundeinkommen mit den flankierenden Maßnahmen wird einen Major Shift auslösen: Abwertung staatlicher Fehlleistung wie Steuerlenkung, Aufwertung des Wirtschaftsstandortes Deutschland.

Die Bundesregierung verhindert eine Spin Off Kultur wie an US-Universitäten, dies ist ein einer Post Silicon Valley Wirtschaft unabdingbar.

Prof Kaku about H1B Visa and the education system 

In Deutschland gilt rein pekuniäres Entgelt immer noch als maßgebend, Arbeitnehmern wird kaum Zeit für eigene Projekte gegeben.

Es wird empfohlen, die Entwicklung von Google (Grades unwichtig, Talent wichtig, andere Entlohnung, Förderung von Projekten für Arbeitnehmer) und Yahoo zu vergleichen.

RSA ANIMATE: Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us

Einteilung in Arbeitnehmer/Arbeitgeber ist in Post Silicon Valley Zeitalter überholt, global ist nicht Wirtschaft sondern Kommunikation.

In globaler Kommunikation liegt die Chance für Wirtschaftsteilnehmer: Überwindung der Terms of Trade, Double-Irish-Dutch-Sandwich-Wirtschaft.

Dies wird durch Aufhebung der Sichtweise: „Mehr sei besser“ überwunden, daraus resultieren u.a. schlechte Entlohnungsfaktoren.

Das Prinzip shareholder value private/public stake zeigt, wie ein hypothetischer  Kuchenanteil eines Investors  (mehr Erläuterung siehe weiter unten) scheinbar sinkt, und dann mehr Inner Value erzeugen kann.


Die  Aufhebung der Sichtweise „Mehr sei besser“ wird die  Nahrung bzw. Ernährungsweise sowie Lebens- und Arbeitsbedingungen verbessern, bei gleichzeitigem Investment Incentive.

Dies kann nur Hand in Hand gehen, es sind sich gegenseitig assistierende Maßnahmen, das Prinzip der Quantum Threshold eines Biotops zeigt es.

Ähnlich wie beim Value Investing, doch hier kommen noch eine Initiierung der Bedingungen hinzu, angefangen beim BGE über Talent Befreiung.

Schrittweise Umstellung erst über das BGE möglich, doch inhärente Verstärkungsfaktoren sind umso besser, je besser die Abstimmung.

Change our culture from electron to photon based mind set 

Grundelement einer Handelswirtschaft ist nicht sein Tauschfaktor (Geld, Entgelt, Devisen, Zinsen) sondern das Vertrauen.

Beim Vertrauen in einer Handelswirtschaft handelt es sich nicht, wie uns eingeredet wird, um Vertrauen in eine Währung, sondern in Menschen.

Denn eine Währung ist gleich dem Staat sowie den Notenbanken und Banken, den Börsen, in der EU gibt es eine Währungsunion, keine Bankenunion!

Wie können wir das natürliche Vertrauen, was bei naturnahen Kulturen und Völkern noch vorhanden ist, wieder herstellen? Demokratie quo vadis?

Flankierende Maßnahmen zur Sicherung der Völker Europas zum Zwecke der Wiederherstellung eines natürlichen Vertrauensverhältnis:

Die Glaubensgrundsätze der Kindeserziehung bestimmen den Mittelpunkt einer anpassungsfähigen („gesunden“) Gesellschaft.

Zwischenruf: Regen ist lebenserhaltend und sehr erfrischend, Regen ist „besser“ als ein Land für ständigen Monsun anfällig machen durch Extrema.


Eine rein auf Diskurs (Diskussionen, Feuerbach, Hegel) und Meinungsaustausch basierende Wirtschaftstheorie resultiert in eine zu enge Rhetorik, eine reine Pro und Contra Kultur kann nicht zu mehr führen, als deren Herleitung aus einer Polarisierung.

In der Natur läuft Kommunikation multikausal ab, Pro & Con Argumentation führt zu  Polarisation, wobei sich das Pro-Argument im Prinzip dem Quasi Con Argument immer mehr annähert, es induziert dieselben engen Strukturen.

Die Vorgabe der Eingabewerte Pro und Con ist wie eine Preselektion, der Ereignisraum ist jedoch viel größer, vielschichtiger und kann nur in Bezug zu einer Fragestellung sinnvolle, d.h. dem Thema angemessen, Ergebnisse erzeugen (Siehe auch Messung in der Quantenmechanik).

Es handelt sich nicht wie oft behauptet, um Wege oder Prozesse von A über B nach C mit rein möglichen z.B. transitiven Abhängigkeiten (z.B. wenn aus Zustand A der Zustand B folgt, und aus B der Zustand C, dann folgt aus A auch der Zustand C) sondern mulitkausale Bedingungen, wobei es sehr viele mögliche Zustände geben kann, die jedoch für eine Fragestellung nur dann in Betracht kommen, wenn sie zugelassen und verstanden sind.

Schon die (Fach)Terminologie ist meist viel zu eng vorbesetzt.

Um Strukturen in Märkten für neue Ansätze vorzubereiten, kann es nicht sein, etwas mehr oder weniger unmotiviert „Starten zu wollen“ – es sollte ein Prinzip aus der Quantenbiologie zum Tragen kommen, vergleichbar zu einem Biotop (z.B. ein Teich), welches mit Hilfe einer vergleichbar winzigen „Menge“ eines Stoffes oder eines Mikroorganismus angereichert wird – denn ob dieses Biotop daraufhin beginnt seine innere Struktur anzupassen (z.B. über das natürliche Wachstum bis zur nächsten „Quantum Threshold“) oder nicht, hängt im Wesentlichen von den dortigen Umweltbedingungen in Austauschprozessen ab.

Mit anderen Worten ist die Response der Marktteilnehmer und des gesamten Umfeldes inklusive der sog. Feedback Schleife entscheidend für einen Informationstransfer – folglich kein Bottom oder Trickle – Down Ansatz, Stichwort Gegenseitigkeit.

Marktteilnehmern werden nach einem solchen Informationstransfer weitere Optionen zur Verfügung stehen – dem Prinzip „Mehr ist besser“ werden Optionen hinzugefügt: Wenn ein Investor vorher von einem Kuchen mit 12 Anteilen sagen wir 3 Stück sein Eigen nannte, dann kann es passieren, daß er danach (nicht notwendigerweise jedoch) seinen Anteil zunächst auf z.B. 2 reduziert sieht, jedoch wird z.B. die Nahrung gesünder sein, er wird weniger davon brauchen, die Bedingungen für eine künstliche mögliche Toxizität sinken und sein Leben kann unter Umständen unter günstigeren Bedingungen (z.B. Wohnen, Arbeiten, Familie) ablaufen, wobei seine Anteile am Kuchen sich nochmal vervielfältigen können, schon da dieser anfängt, seine vorher mehr oder weniger brachliegenden selbstreproduzierenden Eigenschaften wieder aufleben zu lassen (z.B. shareholder value public/private stake).


Deswegen: Erkenntnistheorie statt reines Wissen, „If the facts do not fit the theory, change the facts!“

Further Reading:


Finland’s basic income experiment is already making people feel better after just 4 months

Finland’s Universal Basic Income Program Is Already Reducing Stress for Recipients

Anmerkung: Aus Ressourcen und ökonomischen Gründen kann ich hier nicht jede These im Detail einzeln begründen und erläutern, es geht hier sowieso mehr um das Verständnis bzw. die Initiierung einer latent vorhandenen Verständnisfähigkeit bei jedem Menschen, ähnlich wie jeder Mensch nach der Geburt eine oder mehrere beliebige (Mutter-)sprachen erlernen kann, z.B. ein deutsches Baby chinesisch, oder ein indisches Kleinkind portugiesisch.

Die meisten Thesen wurden auf den Social Network Pages (Twitter,, Facebook und Google Plus rund um Hixgrid bzw. dem Neogrid e.V. und auf erörtert und begründet.





Neogrid e.V.




Google Plus


geschrieben von Sternau \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,